mudgeemudcrab
Bob McCowan (2)
Yellow card to shore #13, down to 14
NSW AAGPS 2025
- Thread starter Joker
- Start date
Jakeburner65
Stan Wickham (3)
Good try to Barker through their big forwards with Shore a man down.
Barker a bit unimpressive given their physical size advantage.
I imagine they will probably take the CAS premiership with what looks like a few music scholarships in their team, although they may well be for sport, as I am not 100% sure of the rules over there.
Barker a bit unimpressive given their physical size advantage.
I imagine they will probably take the CAS premiership with what looks like a few music scholarships in their team, although they may well be for sport, as I am not 100% sure of the rules over there.
BITTA_footy
Stan Wickham (3)
Score?
Jakeburner65
Stan Wickham (3)
Barker 24-14
Jakeburner65
Stan Wickham (3)
Shore hits back with a well worked try from rolling maul from the set piece. Unconverted. Barker 24-19
Jakeburner65
Stan Wickham (3)
Shore commit ritual suicide trying to exit, gifting Barker a try. Barker 31-19
Jakeburner65
Stan Wickham (3)
Barker in again through their big forwards, Shore is done. Barker 38-19 FT
Where's the beef
Sydney Middleton (9)
The Akindoyini Boys lived in PNG (Early 80's)
footyhead1
Frank Row (1)
Best players for Shore: 2,5,7,9,15.
5 and 7 big standouts.
FH1
5 and 7 big standouts.
FH1
InsiderScoop
Ted Fahey (11)
Just watched the Shore Vs Barker. Disappointing standard but nonetheless loved the back and forth between both sides. Was even all game before a couple consolation tries.
Standards
Shore - 2,5,8,9,20
Barker - 3,8,9,12 MVP
Standards
Shore - 2,5,8,9,20
Barker - 3,8,9,12 MVP
mudgeemudcrab
Bob McCowan (2)
mudgeemudcrab here,
Hats off to the barker lads, executed on mistakes made by a talented shore side. The shore boys played great, however failure to exit and let crucial opportunities slip has gifted them the silver medal. Once Again its only “ trials “ so i would say isnt a true indicator. They should hold their heads high staying in the fight with a Red Hot Barker squad. Back to the drawing board and hopefully sharpen the tools before Round 1 of the GPS.
mudgeemudcrab out
Hats off to the barker lads, executed on mistakes made by a talented shore side. The shore boys played great, however failure to exit and let crucial opportunities slip has gifted them the silver medal. Once Again its only “ trials “ so i would say isnt a true indicator. They should hold their heads high staying in the fight with a Red Hot Barker squad. Back to the drawing board and hopefully sharpen the tools before Round 1 of the GPS.
mudgeemudcrab out
Soupnasty
Chris McKivat (8)
Barker 15 was also good as was the 11
Where's the beef
Sydney Middleton (9)
Joeys Knox tomorrow. Go the mighty 14ths taking on the Scots of the Nth. 9ths tomorrow. Game of the round.....
NedKelly
Herbert Moran (7)
I hear all sorts of things about how the NRL club/GPS rugby relationship works but it's all second or third hand so hard to know what's true. On the face of it, it seems NRL clubs can dictate to some extent when boys whose fees they are subsidising can train and play for their schools.
I wonder how these agreements are made. Any contract would presumably be between the club and the boy's guardian, who would then inform the school when the boy could train or play for them.
In an ideal world the school would say, 'Thanks but no thanks, we're only going to select players who are available for every game'. Instead it seems (some) schools are ceding to such stipulations, presumably for the sake of success.
Is it really that simple? And where does it end? Where is the line in the sand for some schools when it comes to availability?