What a load of crap! You use Kings as an examples of so called "loading their teams with rugby scholarship kids" to explain their undefeated under 16's team this year. Anyone, and I repeat ANYONE that knows anything about that team will tell you, the standout performers in that team this year were Lucas Bateman, Jamie Greentree, Jack McCalman, Rober Black and Harry Jones. Correct me if I'm wrong, but all of those boys have been at kings since year 7. I'm not sure who the so called "Scolarship holders" in this team are and to be frank with you, who cares ? To any asute Rugby enthusiast, that age group in Kings always had the potential to become a champion team and are now starting to realise that potential because of good coaching and a less recognised factor known as puberty.
You bang on about Newington's so called "scholarship holders" buying titles. I ask you, what have they achieved ? If these "scholarship holders"make such a difference then why wern't Newington or for that matter joeys winning more games this year ? In any case you seem overly concerned with a minority group(scholarship holders) who IMO have a minimum affect on the competition.