• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

Tahs vs Reds (Super AUS), Narrabri 20/09/25 @ 5:45 pm

Wilson

Wilson

Tim Horan (67)
Reds have overplayed their hand a bit in this first half, has invited this tahs side into the game and they're starting to find some structure
 
KOB1987

KOB1987

John Eales (66)
Wilson said:
That's an interesting advantage interpretation. I don't hate it but it's not exactly standard
Click to expand...
The one that they lost a few meters and the ref said they used the advantage on a try scoring opportunity? I hate the 30m advances / 10 phases and then being given the penalty but that one was pretty bizarre!
 
Wilson

Wilson

Tim Horan (67)
Pretty good first half from the tahs in the end, started very shaky but have found some structure and focus.

Reds need to settle and hold the ball, they're entirely capable of taking the game away from the tahs but not if they leave it chaotic. Injuries a bit troubling with Anderson and De Lutiis off already.
 
Wilson

Wilson

Tim Horan (67)
KOB1987 said:
The one that they lost a few meters and the ref said they used the advantage on a try scoring opportunity? I hate the 30m advances / 10 phases and then being given the penalty but that one was pretty bizarre!
Click to expand...
I think the reasoning makes sense - they spent their advantage gambling on the cross kick, which they duly secured. They shouldn't get it again on the attacking grubber that followed. The alternative (in this interpretation) would be to call no advantage when that cross field kick was caught which definitely doesn't make sense.

I do get the tahs frustration though, normally in that position refs give an advantage all the way to the tryline, phases and plays be damned.
 
Red Runner

Red Runner

Larry Dwyer (12)
Adam84 said:
World Rugby Chairmans son with a couple of errors so far, bit surprising Kohan Herbert wasn’t starting at 7 instead
Click to expand...
Bit of a dick move insinuating nepotism.
He was the Reds best v Tonga and named in the team of the week last week. Your surprise is more ignorance than anything.
 
Red Runner

Red Runner

Larry Dwyer (12)
Reds terrible. Just playing half arsed. Jock not a ten. Cartwright not up to standard as a winger. They’re barely committed.
 
Adam84

Adam84

Tim Horan (67)
Red Runner said:
Bit of a dick move insinuating nepotism.
He was the Reds best v Tonga and named in the team of the week last week. Your surprise is more ignorance than anything.
Click to expand...
Lol, settle down red.. if i thought it was nepotism i wouldn't’ insinuate it, I’d state it. Reds own press release at the start of the season even makes note of who his father Is and the role he holds

Suggesting ignorance because i think Kohan Herbert is better than Tom Robinson is just stupid.
 
Red Runner

Red Runner

Larry Dwyer (12)
Adam84 said:
Lol, settle down red.. if i thought it was nepotism i wouldn't’ insinuate it, I’d state it. Reds own press release makes note of this very fact of who his father Is and the role he holds

Suggesting ignorance because i think Kohan Herbert is better than Tom Robinson is just stupid.
Click to expand...

mate say his name then. Show some respect to the guy. Labelling as his father’s son is just shit.
 
Adam84

Adam84

Tim Horan (67)
Red Runner said:
mate say his name then. Show some respect to the guy. Labelling as his father’s son is just shit.
Click to expand...
Jeez dude, did you also crack the shits when the Reds own media release 2 weeks ago made mention of the fact his father is the current WR (World Rugby) Chairman?
I didn’t even think his selection might be nepotism until you jumped to defence of him, i just think it’s a pretty notable relation that is worthy of mentioning and will continue to do so.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top