If you followed the thread you would have seen that the Oceania team was named on the Wednesday with no Goddard but he was available and then Genia got injured on the Friday, so then Goddard was called into Rebels. Unless the 20s selectors has a crystal ball and knew Genia was going to get injured, he was Not selected.What nonsense
There's an article on Rugby.com.au specifically about Goddard having to be pulled from the u20s to cover the loss of Genia for the Rebels tour of South Africa.
Wessels quotes
"The challenge we have is we want him to play for Australia, because he's got the opportunity to play with the U20s.
“That's something we’ve got to wrestle between is giving the players who've been selected for the Australia 20s the right to play there and also if we need them for Rebels
“There's a bit of a balancing act there (but) if Will is ruled out, we will take Harrison with us.”
Hence Goddard been named on the Rebels bench the past month, including the Blues game which overlapped with the u20s tournament in France.
As to why he probably hasn't been called up to the squad like the Stewarts, Petaia's etc is that we already have 2 quality 9s in the squad.
If you followed the thread you would have seen that the Oceania team was named on the Wednesday with no Goddard but he was available and then Genia got injured on the Friday, so then Goddard was called into Rebels. Unless the 20s selectors has a crystal ball and knew Genia was going to get injured, he was Not selected.
Not only that, but secure the BP on the way.
Players have to analyse why they're making the decisions they make.
Still, some positives - particularly the pack and the breakdown work was solid.
Upright tackles one is in place for this one^^^^^^^ if you mean the nipple-line experiment, isn't that only in effect for the second-tier comp?
Commentary we were getting said a BP would get them a SF, if that's correct then it was a really, really bad call although with other games being played at the same time maybe the guys on field & potentially those in the stands weren't aware of that (or maybe the comms were flat out wrong).
At 17-5 midway through the first half I was expecting a bloodbath so credit to your lads for not letting that happen.
Whatever effort we put into developing quality props over the past few years- can we put the same into 6s, 8s, 9s and 10s?
Your post makes no sense.
Did you watch the game? Australia had a very good win with 14 men for 60 mins. (Italy are a good side with a very good forward pack, they beat Argentina - our next opponent)
And you imply that 4 positions played poorly.
What result did you think was good enough?
Sent from my MHA-L09 using Tapatalk