Aurelius,
If a rich man is willing to throw lots of money around, and there is some success from that, I will suspend judgement until his venture is financially self-supporting.
Sustainability is the goal. When will this venture be self-sustaining?
What "lot" can they throw in? Club rugby? Schools rugby? The Wallabies? 150 years of tradition? The players at all levels? Ditto the supporters as well?
I can only speak on my behalf. I am not for sale, neither is my love of, and record in, the game. And I think you will find that the vast bulk of genuine rugby people would feel a bit like me.
Generally agree but i think a management game akin to FM would work well. It would never be a massive seller though, i don't think.So you think the cash strapped Rugby Australia of all the rugby bodies around the world should be the one pursuing the development of a rugby video game? How much exactly should they be spending on it and what is their expertise that will allow them to succeed in that area.
The AFL have pushed for the creation of video games. They are generally terrible and sell poorly. Their latest one is no different. How much did the AFL lose on that one?
Lots of people play FIFA, Madden or the NBA games who aren't football, NFL or basketball fans because they are sports that translate well into video games and they are consistently good games.
Rugby is a complicated sport and some of the key components of the game are never going to translate well into a video game. How are scrums, mauls and rucks going to work apart from button mashing?
Rugby games have generally been pretty poor and the only ones that haven't are the ones that came out a long time ago. Apart from improved graphics a new game isn't going to change the gameplay dramatically whereas the other sports have progressed massively in gameplay as gaming systems have advanced.
If a good rugby game did exist I don't think you'd find anyone disagreeing that RA should try and bring in fans from that but one doesn't.
Aurelius,
If a rich man is willing to throw lots of money around, and there is some success from that, I will suspend judgement until his venture is financially self-supporting.
Sustainability is the goal. When will this venture be self-sustaining?
So, the Waratahs are spending money on "developmental coaches" who are absolutely distinct from sports psychologists who have absolutely no place in professional sport and are struggling for results and spectators.
Meanwhile, across the country a new start-up club backed by private money is advertising like crazy, experimenting with innovative rule changes to promote running rugby, offering the cheapest tickets in the country and hiring big-name rock bands to provide big name entertainment.
And right around the country, people are wondering just what Rugby Australia can do to turn the ship around. Maybe they should invest in "developmental coaching" at the board level.
Last time that was published was the 2012 ARU annual report I think Killer.Does anyone have any accurate numbers of registered players in Aust.
Their make up: Men, Women, juniors, 15's, 7's, Touch etc
And where they are in Aust.
I have no idea. But what I do know is that we've seen more drive, energy and innovation in the last few months from Minderoo than we've seen from the rugby establishment in . well, ever, from what I can tell.
I don't know what the future holds for World Series Rugby, but at least they're trying something different. All we're getting from the establishment is the same old, same old. Spending big on star players and "development coaches," and now there's even talk of going from four to three (because the last contraction worked so well.) - well, God help Australian rugby if the current lot get free reign over the game. The current administrators sure as hell won't.
How exactly do you propose that RA controls who the Sydney Rugby Union (a sub union of NSWRU) has in their competition?
Got any details of who provided this additional funding and the quantum?Penrith has received some additional funding over the years. The club has far more issues than just money.
More money for the grassroots everywhere would clearly benefit the game. The question is how to generate a greater surplus that can be distributed and how it should best be distributed.
90% of the grassroots around the country would argue that funding Shute Shield clubs more isn't really the grassroots.
Aurelius,
If a rich man is willing to throw lots of money around, and there is some success from that, I will suspend judgement until his venture is financially self-supporting.
Sustainability is the goal. When will this venture be self-sustaining?
Well 20 years later, we've found out the cost of sustainability of Super rugby. And it definitely wasn't worth it.