Twiggy is a given.
Put the ATO money aside, we’ll just continue the narrative that the directors are incompetent buffoons who couldn’t have any idea what racking up $10m+ of debt to the ATO meant for them personally.
There is still $6m they contributed to keep the team going.
Even if this narrative you’re pushing here were true, that the directors intentionally racked up $11million in debt against the ATO as a personal sacrifice to the club with intent to receive a penalty notice. Then yes i would say that’s pretty dam incompetent as it’s absolutely the worst possible way to personally cover debt. Providing a loan, sponsorship, donation
prior to going into voluntary administration is prefferred way to ‘tipping in’.
Was the unpaid superannuation intentional as well, or is that considered ‘tippin-in’ to rugby by those employees.