• Welcome to the Green and Gold Rugby forums. As you can see we've upgraded the forums to new software. Your old logon details should work, just click the 'Login' button in the top right.

Australian Rugby / RA

mst

Peter Johnson (47)
After watching Aussie rugby this weekend i was reading the news about Trump and the G20 and I am wondering if I am the only one seeing similarities between Trump and the republicians and Pulver and the ARU?

In general terms it 2 leaders who are out of their depth, in denial, no clue what they are doing, out of touch, unpopular, everything they do the constituents either oppose or resit (including using the courts to do so), they contradict themselves.....the list goes on. Behind them are parties who are so desperate to cling to power they continually tolerate, defend and support a clown as there leader even though publicly they know they are overwhelming unpopular and there are question over the mental competence of there anointed leader; even from with in its own rank.

No one can see a good outcome or ending.

Its actually funny to compare the pair; and very scary at the same time.
 

Inside Shoulder

Nathan Sharpe (72)
After watching Aussie rugby this weekend i was reading the news about Trump and the G20 and I am wondering if I am the only one seeing similarities between Trump and the republicians and Pulver and the ARU?

In general terms it 2 leaders who are out of their depth, in denial, no clue what they are doing, out of touch, unpopular, everything they do the constituents either oppose or resit (including using the courts to do so), they contradict themselves...the list goes on. Behind them are parties who are so desperate to cling to power they continually tolerate, defend and support a clown as there leader even though publicly they know they are overwhelming unpopular and there are question over the mental competence of there anointed leader; even from with in its own rank.

No one can see a good outcome or ending.

Its actually funny to compare the pair; and very scary at the same time.

Pretty accurate - except for their differing communication styles.
Trump tweets regularly.
The ARU never tell us anything.
 

Rugbynutter39

Michael Lynagh (62)
One thing I am not 'dreaming' about, rather I am enduring nightmares:



The state of the code today in Australia.



Unless there is serious reform at the very top of our rugby system, nothing meaningful will change and from which state we are headed into disaster.


I already feel we are there for the professional game....sponsors and fans leaving in droves....good luck funding super rugby teams period at this rate whether it be 1,4 or 5. If we are going to persist with a flawed Super Rugby competition I feel we will need to cut more than 1 team. We need a new model but would we want to rely on the ARU to deliver that!!!! Nope....

Then we have SA looking to Pro 12 for two teams cut which means SA starting to look to Europe then SANZAAR. NZ not interested in a Trans Tasman competition they say. Well if Saffa's bugger of to Europe who else does that leave....

It looks like Super Rugby is going to limp to end of current broadcast deal but at what cost. Hopefully the NZRU are working out a new Trans Tasman competition that want to involve OZ teams....as would be much more confident of them designing something more sustainable and workable than the ARU.
 
L

Leo86

Guest
I already feel we are there for the professional game..sponsors and fans leaving in droves..good luck funding super rugby teams period at this rate whether it be 1,4 or 5. If we are going to persist with a flawed Super Rugby competition I feel we will need to cut more than 1 team. We need a new model but would we want to rely on the ARU to deliver that!!!! Nope..

Then we have SA looking to Pro 12 for two teams cut which means SA starting to look to Europe then SANZAAR. NZ not interested in a Trans Tasman competition they say. Well if Saffa's bugger of to Europe who else does that leave..

It looks like Super Rugby is going to limp to end of current broadcast deal but at what cost. Hopefully the NZRU are working out a new Trans Tasman competition that want to involve OZ teams..as would be much more confident of them designing something more sustainable and workable than the ARU.

Maybe already in the works. Get an aussie team cut will make them the majority of teams/comp. Lucky the ARU are the skilled businessman/negotiators/forward lookers and would never allow us to be in such a position. Oh wait
 

formerflanker

Ken Catchpole (46)
After watching Aussie rugby this weekend i was reading the news about Trump and the G20 and I am wondering if I am the only one seeing similarities between Trump and the republicians and Pulver and the ARU?

In general terms it 2 leaders who are out of their depth, in denial, no clue what they are doing, out of touch, unpopular, everything they do the constituents either oppose or resit (including using the courts to do so), they contradict themselves...the list goes on. Behind them are parties who are so desperate to cling to power they continually tolerate, defend and support a clown as there leader even though publicly they know they are overwhelming unpopular and there are question over the mental competence of there anointed leader; even from with in its own rank.

No one can see a good outcome or ending.

Its actually funny to compare the pair; and very scary at the same time.

The flaw in your argument is that President Trump has been very successful. He destroyed Hilary who was said by everyone to be unbeatable; has brought the once-great CNN to its biased knees; changed the game on the press warfare against Republicans; appointed the first conservative to the Supreme Court in ages; is re-invigorating manufacturing industry and consequent jobs for Americans; has been the first world leader to speak out against the CAGW scam; and is in the process of resurrecting pride in American exceptionalism.
To summarise - Trump is winning, Pulver is not.
 

Slim 293

Stirling Mortlock (74)
The flaw in your argument is that President Trump has been very successful. He destroyed Hilary who was said by everyone to be unbeatable; has brought the once-great CNN to its biased knees; changed the game on the press warfare against Republicans; appointed the first conservative to the Supreme Court in ages; is re-invigorating manufacturing industry and consequent jobs for Americans; has been the first world leader to speak out against the CAGW scam; and is in the process of resurrecting pride in American exceptionalism.
To summarise - Trump is winning, Pulver is not.

giphy.gif
 

mst

Peter Johnson (47)
The flaw in your argument is that President Trump has been very successful. He destroyed Hilary who was said by everyone to be unbeatable; has brought the once-great CNN to its biased knees; changed the game on the press warfare against Republicans; appointed the first conservative to the Supreme Court in ages; is re-invigorating manufacturing industry and consequent jobs for Americans; has been the first world leader to speak out against the CAGW scam; and is in the process of resurrecting pride in American exceptionalism.
To summarise - Trump is winning, Pulver is not.
We have a winner of the family pack of white sheets and scissors.
 
B

BLR

Guest
I think Bill and Cam said something similar about the Rebels then the Force!

Force, then the Rebels, then the Force, then silence. I pick it to go to the Rebels and back to the Force a few times yet.
 

Ruggo

Mark Ella (57)
Got me buggered what's the difference between talking politics and the ARU. Same shit really.

ARU are a bunch of policy lightweights.

Actually thinking of politics and the ARU makes me think of clearing the whole lot of them out and bringing one PJ Keating in to sort their fucking mess out and get the show back on track.
 

mst

Peter Johnson (47)
Force, then the Rebels, then the Force, then silence. I pick it to go to the Rebels and back to the Force a few times yet.
Maybe they should have got cyclopath to help out with the disposal. Crimestoppers told me he's pretty good at it. Surgical procision like was the way they described his work. (no reward - I checked)
 

cyclopath

George Smith (75)
Staff member
Got me buggered what's the difference between talking politics and the ARU. Same shit really.

ARU are a bunch of policy lightweights.

Actually thinking of politics and the ARU makes me think of clearing the whole lot of them out and bringing one PJ Keating in to sort their fucking mess out and get the show back on track.

He'd trade them for a clock. Probably be able to afford one of these.
370.701.jpg


Batteries not included.
 

Ruggo

Mark Ella (57)
Doesn't look antique enough for Keating. The ARU would hate him because they would also be jealous of his suits.
 
Top