First up, do you really know how “private schools” are funded?
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-05-30/school-funding-explained-without-mentioning-gonski/8555276
Secondly, do you know what a “private school” is?
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-02-14/independent-schools-not-private-and-not-always-rich/9421584
This post is a broad reply to the recent discussion above. It’s not targeted at any particular poster but I find the discussion of “elite private schools” and funding extremely frustrating because it is almost always an uneducated discussion. The fact is that if Government funding to independent schools was cut their fees would go up and many students would flood back into the public schools where we know there are already insufficient schools and classrooms (so the taxpayer will pay to build even more), and the Government cost per student is greater (so the taxpayer will pay more to educate those students). I believe the argument not to give money to private schools is a great example of an argument to cut your nose off to spite your face. It may be a historical anomaly that private schools are funded from the public purse but it’s impossible to back out of that model now without a greater cost to the taxpayer.
To come back on theme though I ask you, if we cut all public funding to private schools and the kids flood back into the public system, where rugby is a distant memory, what does that do for the future of our sport. And yes, there may be scholarships out there overt, or otherwise, but I guarantee the majority of rugby players in independent schools aren’t getting them.