Why is Marto employed as a commentator?
- Thread starter flat_eric
- Start date
- Status
redstragic
Alan Cameron (40)
Kafe sits on the fence a little too much for my liking. He has a brilliant football brain, I'd like o hear him take a stand more often.
P
Paradox
Guest
Kearns can piss off as well. His comments last game against the ABs were worse than usual.
H
H...
Guest
kearns is appalling. absolutely no strategic or tactical rugby nous whatsoever. but loud.
P
Paradox
Guest
Could be, they were quieter.
I like to watch
David Codey (61)
I am a big enough Male Chauvinist pig to prefer a couple of good sorts, rather than Kearns & Marto, if Foxtel insist on providing cheerleaders in lieu of commentators.
brokendown
Vay Wilson (31)
at least we don't have Mexted
Marto is there because he is the best that Queensland have to offer. It keeps the interstate balance in the commentary team.
redstragic
Alan Cameron (40)
Horan is one of the greatest reds of all time, no need for Marto if that's the criteria. Friar isn't bad speaking in the media.
Lets face facts, nearly the entire Foxtel team are not particularly good.
This thread is almost one of who do we dislike the least.
This thread is almost one of who do we dislike the least.
ACR
Bob Davidson (42)
Brian Stoddart - http://theconversation.edu.au/rugby-world-cup-are-cheats-prospering-3416
I think everyone cringes when they hear 'their own' portraying obvious bias.
You basically need someone to call the action, they have to be brief and succinct whilst not simply relaying what we can already see visually. A Martin Tyler for example. Then a simple analyst, preferably intelligent who can dissect the play AND provide colour. Andy Gray or David Pleat for example. Whether you need three commentators (an extra colour commentator) I'm not sure, I would say no.
Personally, I much prefer interesting information, analysis or inside knowledge relevant to the players or game, over humour and quips. The game is entertainment enough for me. Clarkie and Kafe fit the description but they don't quite have the vocabulary of old.
wamberal
Phil Kearns (64)
Clarkie is a hopeless, boring, commentator. He has a few standard phrases that he trots out every game, absolutely without fail.
That's not the start they needed.
That's the start they needed.
He's got the radar working tonight.
The radar's not working tonight.
Australia has to be the next team to score.
And so on, and boring on.
Why do they do it? Do they think we are all idiots with poor eyesight?
That's not the start they needed.
That's the start they needed.
He's got the radar working tonight.
The radar's not working tonight.
Australia has to be the next team to score.
And so on, and boring on.
Why do they do it? Do they think we are all idiots with poor eyesight?
Out of a population of 4 million, and similar number of registered senior rugby players, the Darkness manage to have some very knowledgeable callers at the ITM Cup games. My guess is that they have about 5 "teams" of commentators with so many geographically dispersed games so often that the "central commentary position" can't cover them all.
If the bloody Darkness can do it, why can't we? What have we done to deserve such a third rate team from FoxTel sports?
If the bloody Darkness can do it, why can't we? What have we done to deserve such a third rate team from FoxTel sports?
Inside Shoulder
Nathan Sharpe (72)
liking your post is not sufficient: he is the best in any code. He has knack, despite having done it all, of telling the viewer little things (tactical and practical) that really add value.
Hell he's making me like him!
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
A case of Grange to a case of VB that you would never have said that when Mr Marshall was a regular #9 for the Darkness.
- Status