• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

NSW AAGPS 2025

bigbaldpauline

Frank Row (1)
kings vs view

The view boys showed up. grover was eceptional and controlled the game well as expected. kings look to have no direction, is there an option to move sawyer back to 10 and maybe broing someone to 15 for a bit more directions. feel as though sawye is wasted at the back. hasni the 3 was unreal on of his better games for awhile.
 

twister29

Chris McKivat (8)
Way too early Power rankings:

1. Newington - only undefeated team after 2 rounds (shows how tight the comp will be), looked well drilled at the ruck as well as a strong set piece, along with a few players to come back from injury, will look to storm this competition 10 years on from their last.

2. Joeys - still second, was a very tough game against Newington only going down by 1 point. Also with a few players coming back soon should be a very strong team looking to push Newington.

3. Riverview - With the tight loss to Newington last week as well as beating Kings comfortably and troubling the Kings scrum. They are a dark horse to push in the second half of the season.

4. Kings - Although they suffered a tough loss to View, they have the players and skill to challenge any team on there day seen in both pre-season games against Newington.

5. Scots - Don't have much to say on Scots, they have some very skilled players like the Large brothers and big Heinz Lemoto, they did struggle to beat Shore. Again not much to say.

6. Shore - from Premiers last year to bottom of my rankings this year. Without Rex for half the season and Jai for who knows how long as well as all the year 12 talent from last year, I cant see them doing much until Rex and Jai are back.

So much can change in such a long season, when I come back to this at the end of the year, it will probably be laughable.

-Scrums
I do unfortunately disagree with the Shore report, as I have watched both games.
Shore looked strong considering, playing a close but losing game against Joeys.
They also looked very strong against Scot’s, demonstrating the power of their forwards, especially in dominant line outs and malls, in defence they would have spent 15+ minutes holding Scot’s out from literally on top of the try line. IMHO, separate from controversy and this isn’t a go at any rulings, Shore played the better game of football, believe it or not, without Rex or Jai.

Thus, I simply cannot support the idea that Shore is donezo without Rex and Jai. With Jai most likely back this week, he will only add to Shore as a threat. Aside: A concern is Charlie ‘Galtitude’ Galligan probably missing this round.

Also, as the ‘Premiers last year to bottom of my rankings’, perhaps we should wind back the clock and see how Shore started last season…

Twister.
 

JoeBoar03

Frank Row (1)
My rankings heading into the 3rd round

1. Newington: Undefeated. You’ve got to give it to the Stanmore men after taking out Joeys at the Hill. Enormous side. Can they keep the momentum.

2. Joeys: Very strong and nimble squad. Shades of youth, I believe one of there players is in year 10. Could contest New for the prem.

3. Scots: Insanely clutch victory against Shore, very unlucky loss against Kings. Looking to be a title contender.

4. Kings: Promising form against New in the trials and strong round 1 victory, not sure why they were soundly beaten by View yesterday

5. View: Soundly dispatched by New in the first game. Grover was lacking in round 1 but showed captains presence yesterday in their promising win.

6. Shore: Poor start to the season, perhaps without their key players they will fall back into old form. Hopefully they can turn things around.
 

poider

Frank Row (1)
Very disappointing performance from TKS team after a hard fought win over TSC the week prior. Really only a couple of shinning lights from the team. As has been the trend for them it was the forwards that kept them remotely in the game. Lavercombe, Smith, Perrett and Fonua played tough and when the ball was with those boys, it was the only time TKS looked like something could happen.
Credit where credit is due, the SIC boys played smart and Grover led his boys around the park well. They played smarter rugby and definitely knew those opponent. Dempsey also a standout for the View side from my perspective.
"those opponent" ? Really??? Where did you go to school?
 

BITTA_footy

Frank Nicholson (4)
This is such a flawed argument.

12 of the Newington first 15 who beat Joeys today came to the school in year 7 or 8.

Before making a claim please make sure its correct first
Classic New boys. Please understand I’m not an idiot, and not claiming anything either. Obliviously a very touchy subject for the New boys…

And if New has 12/15 from year 7 and 8 in 1s, how come they never win in juniors? 3 players don’t make a team.
 
Last edited:

Ruck 'n' Roll

Frank Row (1)
My rankings heading into the 3rd round

1. Newington: Undefeated. You’ve got to give it to the Stanmore men after taking out Joeys at the Hill. Enormous side. Can they keep the momentum.

2. Joeys: Very strong and nimble squad. Shades of youth, I believe one of there players is in year 10. Could contest New for the prem.

3. Scots: Insanely clutch victory against Shore, very unlucky loss against Kings. Looking to be a title contender.

4. Kings: Promising form against New in the trials and strong round 1 victory, not sure why they were soundly beaten by View yesterday

5. View: Soundly dispatched by New in the first game. Grover was lacking in round 1 but showed captains presence yesterday in their promising win.

6. Shore: Poor start to the season, perhaps without their key players they will fall back into old form. Hopefully they can turn things around.
Struggle to see how you have view so low. Sounds like a quality squad coming together, would definitely have then above scots and kings. Mind you scots only narrowly beat a seemlying weak shore team?
 

Up and In

Chris McKivat (8)
Coming from a naive angle, but I'd be really surprised if Newington's side on the weekend was 80% Year 7 starters. I stand to be corrected. Shore was 2/3 (10) Year 7 starters on the weekend and I'd really question if New were below this. Their results in this age group up to this year don't support this but happy to be challenged. 3 new arrivals?
 

Jumping_jack

Ward Prentice (10)
U
Coming from a naive angle, but I'd be really surprised if Newington's side on the weekend was 80% Year 7 starters. I stand to be corrected. Shore was 2/3 (10) Year 7 starters on the weekend and I'd really question if New were below this. Their results in this age group up to this year don't support this but happy to be challenged. 3 new arrivals?
Until the injured guys come back for Shore you mean? Cause they stated year 10 or 11?
 

JoeBoar03

Frank Row (1)
Struggle to see how you have view so low. Sounds like a quality squad coming together, would definitely have then above scots and kings. Mind you scots only narrowly beat a seemlying weak shore team?
Very very good point you make. Considering view lost to a strong Newington team and put Kings to the sword. I stand corrected. View should be at 3rd then Kings then Scots
 

wisemaan

Jimmy Flynn (14)
With Callaghan coming back into the team, presumably at 15 where does that put Wendt.
I’m assuming Wendt will go to 12 based of the chat I’ve heard as they want him in the centers and Robertson dropped. I find this quite harsh as he has been playing so well. There could be other possibilities however I think this is the most likely. Whatever is decided it will be very tight and make it an unfortunate drop
 

Here for the advice

Allen Oxlade (6)
I’m assuming Wendt will go to 12 based of the chat I’ve heard as they want him in the centers and Robertson dropped. I find this quite harsh as he has been playing so well. There could be other possibilities however I think this is the most likely. Whatever is decided it will be very tight and make it an unfortunate drop
Agree has not show anything to warrant playing 12 in 1s was part of a back line that got royally flogged by joeys and was not a stand out at all on the weekend. If wanted in centres play a game in 12 in 2XV to show.
 

twister29

Chris McKivat (8)
Ahh but you did just claim that Newington "brings in hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of players into the opens". Is that not a claim?
Moreover how could that be correct if 12 out of the first 15 were already at the school in year 7?
Say school & boarding cost combo = $60k (very generous)
Assuming all 3 not from year 7 are covered by the school: 3x60k =180 K… That is hundreds and thousands of dollars.

Aware this conversation is pushing hard against a line, if you wish to continue by all means go ahead but on ‘that’ forum.

Twister
 
Top