• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

Wallabies v Lions Game 2 MCG 26 July

Micheal

Dick Tooth (41)
I honestly reckon that one was the end of professional rugby Aus.
It sounds ridiculous but after the game I genuinely thought: “why do I even bother?”

I’m 30 and one by one all of the friends that I used to watch rugby with have moved on over the years, as they can’t handle the officiating and the disappointment.

Then I flick over to Reddit and I see every other nation belittling us in a way that no one else in world rugby ever really cops it, and it is really apparent to me that no one sport that I watch ever makes me feel this way.

I know I’m being a sook but eventually you have to ask why you continue to tune in.
World Rugby Law 9.20 (a–d):
  • 9.20(a):
    A player must not charge into a ruck or maul.
    Charging includes any contact made without binding onto a player in the ruck/maul, such as a “shoulder charge.”
  • 9.20(b):
    A player must not make contact with an opponent above the line of the shoulders.
    This includes head or neck contact, even if unintentional.
  • 9.20(c):
    A player must bind onto another player when joining a ruck or maul.
  • 9.20(d):
    Dangerous play in a ruck or maul includes:
    • Collapsing a ruck/maul
    • Targeting the lower limbs of players in a ruck
    • Lifting or dropping onto a player in a ruck

In addition to Law 9.20, World Rugby’s Head Contact Process (HCP) is the protocol referees use to determine sanction levels (red/yellow/no card) when there’s:
  • Direct head or neck contact
  • Dangerous play
  • Lack of mitigation (e.g. sudden movement by ball-carrier)
If head contact is reckless or intentional and no mitigation exists, a red card is the expected outcome.
Someone post this over at Reddit and shut the fucking pomms up.
 

drewprint

Desmond Connor (43)
It sounds ridiculous but after the game I genuinely thought: “why do I even bother?”

I’m 30 and one by one all of the friends that I used to watch rugby with have moved on over the years, as they can’t handle the officiating and the disappointment.

Then I flick over to Reddit and I see every other nation belittling us in a way that no one else in world rugby ever really cops it, and it is really apparent to me that no one sport that I watch ever makes me feel this way.

I know I’m being a sook but eventually you have to ask why you continue to tune in.

Someone post this over at Reddit and shut the fucking pomms up.
Sub 30 for 40 and you’ve nailed it for me too. There’s only so many heartbreaking moments you can take hey.
 

rod skellet

Chilla Wilson (44)
World Rugby Law 9.20 (a–d):
  • 9.20(a):
    A player must not charge into a ruck or maul.
    Charging includes any contact made without binding onto a player in the ruck/maul, such as a “shoulder charge.”
  • 9.20(b):
    A player must not make contact with an opponent above the line of the shoulders.
    This includes head or neck contact, even if unintentional.
  • 9.20(c):
    A player must bind onto another player when joining a ruck or maul.
  • 9.20(d):
    Dangerous play in a ruck or maul includes:
    • Collapsing a ruck/maul
    • Targeting the lower limbs of players in a ruck
    • Lifting or dropping onto a player in a ruck

In addition to Law 9.20, World Rugby’s Head Contact Process (HCP) is the protocol referees use to determine sanction levels (red/yellow/no card) when there’s:
  • Direct head or neck contact
  • Dangerous play
  • Lack of mitigation (e.g. sudden movement by ball-carrier)
If head contact is reckless or intentional and no mitigation exists, a red card is the expected outcome.
from my limited tv view , the last play is a penalty and a yellow card. in addition. Smith chose the wrong team. LSL (Lukhan Salakaia-Loto) and tupou should have been in the 23. Bell should have started. Valenti and Skelton should have played 64 min min.
 

dru

Jason Little (69)
Dru, unfortunately the Lions also have fresh legs. The whole bomb squad notion is utter bullshit. Big errors by Joe in replacing the two props at half time and Valetini if not injured.

Hey BR. The hand grenade got called out when we lost Potter. The swap between Gordon and Tate with the change in pace etc never happened. When I called out our fresh legs, we had them and they didnt. It was nearly a 10 min window.

I would still call the hand grenade - but to be honest, 6 forwards on the bench needs to achieve more than they did tonight.

I agree though, I would keep the front row and Valetini for another 10 mins after the break. Unless injury.

I don't however have a problem with a 6/2 bench and the Lions are exactly the sort of opponent where I would have it in mind.
 

Brumby Runner

Jason Little (69)
he is. but hes also angling in
Wow, Genge boring in on the LH side and the THboring in on the other side against Bell. How thw F*ck does the hooker come out alive? To be honest, I didn't se Genge boring in at all bnut he certainly went elbow to the ground on a number of scrums bringing Robbo down but Genge winning the penalty.
 

twister29

Fred Wood (13)
Can someone point to the law that would make the clean out illegal? I’m not super across it — is the neck mentioned anywhere?
World Rugby Law 9.20 (a–d):
  • 9.20(a):
    A player must not charge into a ruck or maul.
    Charging includes any contact made without binding onto a player in the ruck/maul, such as a “shoulder charge.”
  • 9.20(b):
    A player must not make contact with an opponent above the line of the shoulders.
    This includes head or neck contact, even if unintentional.
  • 9.20(c):
    A player must bind onto another player when joining a ruck or maul.
  • 9.20(d):
    Dangerous play in a ruck or maul includes:
    • Collapsing a ruck/maul
    • Targeting the lower limbs of players in a ruck
    • Lifting or dropping onto a player in a ruck

In addition to Law 9.20, World Rugby’s Head Contact Process (HCP) is the protocol referees use to determine sanction levels (red/yellow/no card) when there’s:
  • Direct head or neck contact
  • Dangerous play
  • Lack of mitigation (e.g. sudden movement by ball-carrier)
If head contact is reckless or intentional and no mitigation exists, a red card is the expected outcome.
 
Top