PS - lincoln, curious that you use well known Shore old boy Errol Flynn for your ID pic, yet you insist no shore affiliation.
Speaking of red cards in the Shore v Joeys game, the Joeys boy who was sent off was apparently told by the ref that the tackle "was the worst he'd ever seen in schoolboy rugby" anybody at the game may be able to back me up when i say it was perhaps a little overkill?Actually affiliation is relatively strong with emphasis on the word relative - the big fella was a contemporary of one. As an aside, I think Shore's performances across the A/B teams last Saturday at home somewhat supports the notion of an "indolent rich" (aka spoilt Mosman brats) problem that will in some fashion eventually totally infest all GPS schools - the red card in the 1sts could also be linked to this issue.
A question - it was suggested to me that Sydney University and no doubt many other clubs, through various foundations, old boy funds and the like foot the school fees for selected Junior talent, in return for the promise (or hope) of future allegiance. Has anyone else heard of this sort of scholarship?
Suppose it is also not beyond the realms of possibility for a few wealthy fathers to pool together a few thousand each to underwrite the education of some rugby prodigy into the school of their choice.
Both mechanisms would be beyond the schools to police in regards to GPS / CAS non sporting scholarship edicts.
Very convenient... and just a coincidence that they play rugby. ;-) How do you explain all of the other good sportsmen that New seem to have attracted? Particularly in basketball... No Tongan Church thing to hide behind there - just plain out in the open scholarships. Face it Blindside - Newingtons level of importing atm is taking the #iss!
Speaking of red cards in the Shore v Joeys game, the Joeys boy who was sent off was apparently told by the ref that the tackle "was the worst he'd ever seen in schoolboy rugby" anybody at the game may be able to back me up when i say it was perhaps a little overkill?
Interesting comment re Trinity - if anything I thought they had significantly pulled back on the swimming band.
When Riverview celebrated their centenary in 1980, they didn't need any outsiders/scholarship holders to win a range of premierships/titles in most sports...rugby, cricket, athletics and in part, rowing...it was just that year the blokes played for each other and for school.
Its the same this season with Newington v ViewSpirit often goes further than the dollars do. Just ask the Kings teams of 2008 and 2010 (particularly 2010 as they failed miserably). When the going gets tough in a match would you rather have a kid on the field who has been there since Yr 7 and lives and breathes the place, or some bought in supposed star who suddenly pulls a heart string when things start going against him?
I know who i'd choose... and its within the rules!
When Riverview celebrated their centenary in 1980, they didn't need any outsiders/scholarship holders to win a range of premierships/titles in most sports...rugby, cricket, athletics and in part, rowing...it was just that year the blokes played for each other and for school.
Regardless of spirit, I don't think any school can win a big sporting premiership without scholarship players.. by those big sports I mean Rugby, Athletics, Swimming, Cross Country, Rowing, Soccer.. even now Tennis, Basketball, Cricket and the like are dominated by scholarship players playing two sports.
I may be referring to the Queensland GPS system as I am unaware of how the New South Welshman do it, but it has been clearly illustrated this year (by Gregory Terrace) that without sporting scholarships, sooner or later the school will fall behind. Sure, a school can last on pride alone for a certain period of time but once the other schools have the initial base scholarships and winning culture in place, the non-scholarship school will fall behind and know that they can't compete.
Just for the record, I'm not against scholarships for the elite schools as the schools clearly have something more to offer than public eduction. I just think morally if schools decide to not follow suit they will sooner or later fall behind. The opportunity scholarships present are lifelong and if I were half decent enough to receive one I would certainly take it with both hands, regardless how devoted to the school I am.
Went with a Grammar dad to Kings today to watch his son play in the main game. Below is a report on the 16As game I'm just duplicating from the NSW GPS thread (Kings 93 Grammar 0):
Went with a Grammar dad to Kings today to watch his son play in the main game. Below is a report on the 16As game I'm just duplicating from the NSW GPS thread (Kings 93 Grammar 0):
Their halves Davis (9) and Tulloch (10) just did tore holes in Grammar's defence and laid on a heap of tries for their outside backs particularly Carter (13). I'd be very surprised if they're not the GPS U16 nos 9 and 10 and given the amount of football they've played together for Country and Illawarra will also be the likely NSW Schools U16 halves.
Quick Question CTPE: How are the country (illawarra) 9 & 10 playing for Kings, if remember serves me correct isn't Kings the poor school in need of multi-millions of $ in Fed Government support based (for a new rifle range or two) at North Parramatta. Seems a long way from the 'gong.
The No. 9 for Kings is their on a scholarship.
Can't answer that one magpie4ever...where they come from and who they play for is of little interest to me. Like many, I just enjoy watching great young rugby talent playing rugby the way it should be played. Perhaps your question is better posed on the Scholarships thread.