CAS_Rugby
Banned
What was the penalty count?Not at Hornsby but my spies tell me Barker dominated for first 50 minutes then rang in the subs. 47/26 at FT.
What was the penalty count?Not at Hornsby but my spies tell me Barker dominated for first 50 minutes then rang in the subs. 47/26 at FT.
Penalties. Barker was penalised a lot apparently.What was the penalty count?
Cranbrook will bounce back.Knox back row and backs were absolutely clinical today; one of those days where things just clicked every time cranbrook turned over the ball, of which they had plenty but were very clunky. Trinity Knox will be interesting
Of course they will and this week we will have chorus of terrible jokes coming from the Cranbrook boys and hype up videos instead of just focusing on the game of rugby. Cant wait for them to distract themselves as always.Cranbrook will bounce back.
Agree with your English lesson but wouldn't call Shore, SIC & NC weak trials.Just to repeat Snort's First Law of Rugby: if you are down 0-26, you are "dominating" nothing, except the number zero. You may, however, have lots of territory that you have failed to convert into points.
I suspect Cranbrook are paying the penalty for scheduling some pretty soft trial games.
Not sure you will find any pies at the Cranbrook tuckshop. All gourmet waygu beef burgers, sashimi tacos & charcuterie boards!Will I be seeing any of my fellow wise forum members at the Cranbrook game this weekend? If so, let’s catch up, first one there buys the pies!
Much agreed, got myself a nice pie and burger, would eat again.Got a lesson on the park today but the Cranbrook canteen was a hit. Definitely worth the drive from Warrawee.
Yes, it’s deeply unclear to me what St Aloysius thinks it gains from this.
Almost 100yrs of history.That score probably (for now) spells the end of Aloys' involvement in the 1st XV comp.