• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

Super Rugby Pacific 2025

PhilClinton

Paul McLean (56)
Making a joke about the Tahs in an NBA forum would be considered living rent free.

Making a joke about the Tahs in generic Super Rugby Pacific discussion on a rugby forum is probably more like just living.
 

John S

Peter Fenwicke (45)
Making a joke about the Tahs in an NBA forum would be considered living rent free.

Making a joke about the Tahs in generic Super Rugby Pacific discussion on a rugby forum is probably more like just living.
Maybe - but coming on top of nearly a page worth of Tahs comments in the match threads for the QF's just puts this additional joke up there.
 

Brumby Runner

Jason Little (69)
That's a decent response in my view.

A six team final series is always tricky. Teams 1 and 2 don't really want a week off in the first week of the finals because the extra home final is worth a fair bit of money. Until last weekend it is pretty much unheard of that a sixth placed team will beat the minor premiers.

One of the things I read about the final series originally is that the matchups (and a progressing loser only dropping one place) was designed as the method which ensured there couldn't be a repeat matchup from week 1 to 2.
Dropping No 1 to No 4 in the semis and raising No 6 to No 3 ensures there will be no repeat match ups in the semis. The other two semi finalists are both winners so couldn't possibly have played the week before. Just a smokescreen.
 

waiopehu oldboy

Rocky Elsom (76)
It would appear so...

“Super Rugby Pacific management sought input from all stakeholders in scheduling the qualifying finals fixtures.

“While the first preference of the Brumbies was to play on Saturday afternoon, it was ultimately decided to be in the best interests of the competition for the game to be scheduled in the peak television time slot in Australia."

 

Tomthumb

Ken Catchpole (46)
I would argue that more eyeballs onto a playoff game that would be literally pointless isn't a good thing for the competition

Thankfully the Blues saved the day
 

JRugby2

Phil Hardcastle (33)
I would argue that more eyeballs onto a playoff game that would be literally pointless isn't a good thing for the competition

Thankfully the Blues saved the day
No but regular scheduling is important to retaining and building viewership. My guess off the back off MarkJ's comment is that RA/Nine/Stan probably wanted to retain that 7:30pm Saturday slot as their premier timeslot for rugby, and it would have been far too late for the Saders to host the Reds in ChCh
 

Tomthumb

Ken Catchpole (46)
No but regular scheduling is important to retaining and building viewership. My guess off the back off MarkJ's comment is that RA/Nine/Stan probably wanted to retain that 7:30pm Saturday slot as their premier timeslot for rugby, and it would have been far too late for the Saders to host the Reds in ChCh
Yes but it's the playoffs, at this point of the year the integrity of the Comp needs to take priority. And if No Aussie team made the top 3 the slot wouldn't have been there anyway

And surely all these permutations would have been thought of when they came up with this system before season started? Feels like they picked a finals structure out of a hat and just never thought about it again
 

JRugby2

Phil Hardcastle (33)
Yes but it's the playoffs, at this point of the year the integrity of the Comp needs to take priority. And if No Aussie team made the top 3 the slot wouldn't have been there anyway

And surely all these permutations would have been thought of when they came up with this system before season started? Feels like they picked a finals structure out of a hat and just never thought about it again
But we did have a team in the top 3, and nothing set in stone prior so this is a moot counter point IMO. I suppose to believed benefits of ensure that we had the Australian team who had earned a home final (and therefore most likely to win) to be playing in our best slot, outweighed any perceived hits to the integrity of the comp?

As a side, while it's less likely to be an issue in the NRL/ AFL with most of those comps being played out of the east coast - I guarantee in those competitions any clash like this (comp integrity vs broadcast), broadcast will win.

Agree it's definitely been a weird structure to finals. It seems no one in either Super Rugby or any of the teams spent the time to go through possible scenarios to work out where the fail points we're and probably why we'll see our 3rd iteration of a finals structure in 3 years.
 
Top