PhilClinton
Paul McLean (56)
Just had to have a passing swipe
I am glad someone found it funny!
Just had to have a passing swipe
Maybe - but coming on top of nearly a page worth of Tahs comments in the match threads for the QF's just puts this additional joke up there.Making a joke about the Tahs in an NBA forum would be considered living rent free.
Making a joke about the Tahs in generic Super Rugby Pacific discussion on a rugby forum is probably more like just living.
Dropping No 1 to No 4 in the semis and raising No 6 to No 3 ensures there will be no repeat match ups in the semis. The other two semi finalists are both winners so couldn't possibly have played the week before. Just a smokescreen.That's a decent response in my view.
A six team final series is always tricky. Teams 1 and 2 don't really want a week off in the first week of the finals because the extra home final is worth a fair bit of money. Until last weekend it is pretty much unheard of that a sixth placed team will beat the minor premiers.
One of the things I read about the final series originally is that the matchups (and a progressing loser only dropping one place) was designed as the method which ensured there couldn't be a repeat matchup from week 1 to 2.
That might have been a request from Nine/Stan - have the Australian game in the Saturday 7.30pm timeslot
No but regular scheduling is important to retaining and building viewership. My guess off the back off MarkJ's comment is that RA/Nine/Stan probably wanted to retain that 7:30pm Saturday slot as their premier timeslot for rugby, and it would have been far too late for the Saders to host the Reds in ChChI would argue that more eyeballs onto a playoff game that would be literally pointless isn't a good thing for the competition
Thankfully the Blues saved the day
Yes but it's the playoffs, at this point of the year the integrity of the Comp needs to take priority. And if No Aussie team made the top 3 the slot wouldn't have been there anywayNo but regular scheduling is important to retaining and building viewership. My guess off the back off MarkJ's comment is that RA/Nine/Stan probably wanted to retain that 7:30pm Saturday slot as their premier timeslot for rugby, and it would have been far too late for the Saders to host the Reds in ChCh
But we did have a team in the top 3, and nothing set in stone prior so this is a moot counter point IMO. I suppose to believed benefits of ensure that we had the Australian team who had earned a home final (and therefore most likely to win) to be playing in our best slot, outweighed any perceived hits to the integrity of the comp?Yes but it's the playoffs, at this point of the year the integrity of the Comp needs to take priority. And if No Aussie team made the top 3 the slot wouldn't have been there anyway
And surely all these permutations would have been thought of when they came up with this system before season started? Feels like they picked a finals structure out of a hat and just never thought about it again