Jimmy_Crouch
Ken Catchpole (46)
I think the dislike stems from the fact he has not progressed his game over the past three or four seasons. People expected more from him and are a little disappointed.
Wallabies 2021
- Thread starter KOB1987
- Start date
I think the dislike stems from the fact he has not progressed his game over the past three or four seasons. People expected more from him and are a little disappointed.
Adam84
Nick Farr-Jones (63)
I think fullback is the weakest position in Australian Rugby at the moment, i agree Banks is a good Super Rugby player but seems to struggle at test level, never really filled me with confidence he is up to the task. I agree with Jimmy_Crouch when he first came on the scene i thought he would develop into a latham-esque player, but he hasn't.
There is currently no better candidate then him though, i like Jock and think he is a smart footballer but he doesn't have the same size or speed as Tom and would struggle at test level i think, DHP is in a similar category to Banks he is good Super Rugby player but an average test player. Maddocks might have the highest potential, but wont realise that playing in the current Tahs setup.
There is currently no better candidate then him though, i like Jock and think he is a smart footballer but he doesn't have the same size or speed as Tom and would struggle at test level i think, DHP is in a similar category to Banks he is good Super Rugby player but an average test player. Maddocks might have the highest potential, but wont realise that playing in the current Tahs setup.
I reckon Hodge would be favorite to play fullback at this stage.
dru
Tim Horan (67)
That would be my call.
Sheepie
Sydney Middleton (9)
For starters he needs better consistency. Currently his play depends way too much on how good or bad his first touches are. If those are not good, even if it's a particularly difficult/troublesome first touch that wasn't good, he's ruined for the rest of the game.
Adam84
Nick Farr-Jones (63)
Possibly mine also, but not without game-time there. Rebels need to play him at 15 if that's to be his role at test level. He definitely isn't the form 12
I don't think it's going to matter.
I think Rennie will pick To'omua at 12 and Hodge at 15. It would be ideal if every player was playing in the position they were likely to be selected in but ultimately I don't think it's going to limit his choices.
Adam84
Nick Farr-Jones (63)
Le me rephrase, if Hodge was playing fullback at Super Rugby level then i think he would have a much stronger chance of locking down the 15 jersey at test level.
Sure Rennie might pick him there regardless, but without the game time at Super Rugby level then he will be a bit undercooked in the nuances of fullback and risk losing his spot to someone like Banks, instead reverting back to his super-sub role.
Sure Rennie might pick him there regardless, but without the game time at Super Rugby level then he will be a bit undercooked in the nuances of fullback and risk losing his spot to someone like Banks, instead reverting back to his super-sub role.
upthereds#!
Ken Catchpole (46)
One of my several mistakes was going for what I thought was a proper distribution of positions.
I never thought they would only have 5 props in a 40 man squad (leaving Sio out) - but because they wanted more of others (8 players for the 6/8 jersey - Anstee, Kemeny, Swinton, Wilson, Valetini, Samu, Naisarani, Uru)
Forcefield
Ken Catchpole (46)
Banks was tried and found wanting. I think you'd be better served with Wright or Hodge.
Derpus
George Gregan (70)
He can catch a high ball and has a low error rate. Given he's likely to be surrounded by strike power in guys like Daugunu, Vunivalu, Koroibete, Paisami, Petaia, etc. I think that basically puts him in pole position.
Hodge doesn't fill me with confidence under the high ball. Wright could be a great option there, but never seem him play it.
James GC
Larry Dwyer (12)
I agree that Banks has not been anywhere good enough to own that Wallabies 15 spot and he is a caretaker at best, but I really don't get why you would put someone like Hodge there in his place. If Hodge was at the Brumbies there is no way in hell he would be selected over Tom Banks at fullback so why would we do so at test level? As for Wright I am a huge fan but we are yet to see if he has the potential at fullback, again whilst Tom Banks is in that spot for the Brumbies I can't see them putting Wright there. I think Pincus could have the potential at fullback huge boot and very good at kick returns with space and time a year or 2 off at this point though but so is the RWC.
We have this sort of debate every year, as Hodge looks so-so at Super level.
But every year he gets picked in the Wallabies, and every year he lifts his game the moment he pulls on a gold jersey. He won a Bledisloe match playing 10 last year, somehow. He's one of a rare breed who seem to save their best for when it matters most.
He's proven himself enough times that I don't really mind much about his Super form.
.
Sheepie
Sydney Middleton (9)
I've long felt Banks was overhyped and not understood why people seem to love him so much. And while last year in the Brumbies I thought he again was getting praise for just touching the ball or being anywhere near it, in the Wallabies I felt he was quite solid. This year for the Brumbies he's actually been impressing me too. I'd be perfectly OK with him being the first pick for 15 in the Wallabies this year.
Adam84
Nick Farr-Jones (63)
Yes he gets picked at the Wallabies but he never locks down a position as his own, and he has been trialled in more positions then anyone. I agree he played well in the Bledisloe last year, but there have been plenty of matches where he hasn't.
If he is to be the 15 at test level, then he should be playing there now.
Rugbynutter39
Michael Lynagh (62)
I agree on banks as safe - and steady but a match winner no. A quality super rugby fullback yeh I could agree that...yes a quality test level full back no...
To be clear it is not Tom banks fault that he is the best we probably got at fullback in absence of other emerging options but yes I hope other better options emerge as always never seen him as test full back material and equally done nothing to convince otherwise.
Rugbynutter39
Michael Lynagh (62)
wamberal
Phil Kearns (64)
Hodge will be in the 23. He is playing well. I think he would be a safer and better option than Banks. Apart from anything else, he has a degree of versatility that Banks does not, he can play anywhere in the backs except 9. That is worth a lot, I reckon.
eastman
Arch Winning (36)
The problem with this kind of narrative is that we generously overlook all the times where Hodge hasn't performed strongly for the Wallabies. For every game where he plays well (rarely very well), there's another three where he misses the kicks he's expected to nail, generally plods around the field in his awkward manner, and again we start wishing we had someone who could break a tackle and had pace.
Let's reward the form fullback in Super Rugby AU (Banks)- Hodge isn't ever going to be the solution at 15.
upthereds#!
Ken Catchpole (46)
Beale - call up Beale 