Where to for Super Rugby?
- Thread starter Quick Hands
- Start date
- Status
ACT Crusader
Jim Lenehan (48)
It's funny the different reporting of what has transpired today with regards to the legal proceedings.
I am yet to see the court documents or the order, but by the sounds of it there has been a court date set for next week and some form of order (most likely by consent) to not proceed with any actions until at least the outcome of next week's hearing or until further order.
I am yet to see the court documents or the order, but by the sounds of it there has been a court date set for next week and some form of order (most likely by consent) to not proceed with any actions until at least the outcome of next week's hearing or until further order.
Killer
Cyril Towers (30)
is a high profile public interest case like this where the outcome has been seen by most of the public to be unfair. Where comment has been made by many high profile people including Premiers.
Is the review more likely to allow an appeal to be heard for transparency. Also the open court situation will help this.
Or will they completely ignore the public noise?
Of course assuming the Force can make a reasonable case.
Forceright
Allen Oxlade (6)
bedandbreakfast
Stan Wickham (3)
My reading is an injunction is in place to stop any "discontinuation" of the Force or its licence. An appeal has been lodged and a decision as to whether to hear the appeal or not will be made by Wednesday next week.
Inside Shoulder
Nathan Sharpe (72)
and don't they play like it?
James Pettifer
Jim Clark (26)
You misread. He said that "There will be a clear pathway for young Western Australian rugby players" and will offer free flights to Sydney so that they can go along the pathway to be Wallabies.
jimmydubs
Dave Cowper (27)
http://www.rugby.com.au/news/2017/08/14/05/36/force-appeal-haylett-petty-coleman
Seems to be the guts of it. But I'm no legal eagle.
Blue
Andrew Slack (58)
So here is what I am trying to work out. Apologies if this has been answered but...
Let's say the High Court of the land tells the ARU that it cannot turf either the Force or Rebels and that they are legally obliged to keep them in the comp, what then?
So now the ARU goes back to SANZAR and says nope boys sorry, even though we agreed to get rid of one, wer'e obliged to honor their contracts and they are still in.
Then we end up with Super 16 by default, right? The Cheetahs and Kings are gone. Not coming back. Now what?
5 Kiwi
5 Aussie
4 SA
Wolves and Jaguars
Lol.
Let's say the High Court of the land tells the ARU that it cannot turf either the Force or Rebels and that they are legally obliged to keep them in the comp, what then?
So now the ARU goes back to SANZAR and says nope boys sorry, even though we agreed to get rid of one, wer'e obliged to honor their contracts and they are still in.
Then we end up with Super 16 by default, right? The Cheetahs and Kings are gone. Not coming back. Now what?
5 Kiwi
5 Aussie
4 SA
Wolves and Jaguars
Lol.
Highlander35
Andrew Slack (58)
We're left with Super 16.
And the overwhelming likelihood is that the ARU would find itself responsible for all 11 others sides/4 Governing Unions additional costs, including but not limited to travel, accomodation and loss of broadcast revenue, as I reckon they would get another round of renegotiation.
M
Moono75
Guest
James O'Connor must be thinking "and you guys thought MY BRAND sucked and brought the game into disrepute"!!
bedandbreakfast
Stan Wickham (3)
M
Moono75
Guest
Save the Force petition on change.org closing in on 9,000 signatories. Get on and sign it to show your support.
www.change.org/p/the-aru-keep-the-western-force-in-the-super-rugby-competition?
www.change.org/p/the-aru-keep-the-western-force-in-the-super-rugby-competition?
Wilson
David Codey (61)
There's been some speculation that if Australia fail to cut a team then the sunwolves will be turfed, but the longer it takes the more likely it is that we'll have a 16 team comp next year.
Sent from my E5823 using Tapatalk
stoff
Bill McLean (32)
I just don't understand why he ARU wouldn't have quietly made official notification over the weekend to SANZAAR that the Force were out. I suspect SANZAAR are quietly and free from legal restraint finalising the arrangements for the 15 team comp.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
B
BLR
Guest
Well with the injunction the Force are not officially out. So there is that.
andrewM
Herbert Moran (7)
You would have to think, unless SANZAAR are as thick as the ARU, that they have been working on contingencies of something like this happening since the day that the Force lodged their injunction.
Their silence, given it is pretty late in the day for planning wise for next season, is curious.
Their silence, given it is pretty late in the day for planning wise for next season, is curious.
chibimatty
Jimmy Flynn (14)
If it is a 16-team comp, I suppose they could have a 6-team Aussie conference with some of the inter-group fixtures re-arranged. If costs are to be paid, then that's an opportunity for Twiggy.
- Status