Aurelius
Ted Thorn (20)
Just threaten an invasion and the Frenchies will fold like a cheap suit.
We need Olympic medals more than they do, anyhow.
Australian Rugby / RA
- Thread starter Dave Beat
- Start date
Just threaten an invasion and the Frenchies will fold like a cheap suit.
We need Olympic medals more than they do, anyhow.
kiap
Steve Williams (59)
^ We probably need to hope it's the case. 
He has also run under 10.3 as a 16 y.o for the 100m
Same guy
He has also run under 10.3 as a 16 y.o for the 100m
Derpus
George Gregan (70)
Didnt go so well for Bolt
Also, Usain Bolt was 31 or 32 when he tried to make that transition and the experiment lasted a few months.
You'd also think that rugby 7s is a much easier sport to showcase incredible speed than in football. .
You'd also think that rugby 7s is a much easier sport to showcase incredible speed than in football. .
Finsbury Girl
Trevor Allan (34)
Financials are interesting.
Would fire who is managing the treasury though
Corp costs are ridiculously high ; loads of snouts in the trough it seems.
Would fire who is managing the treasury though
Corp costs are ridiculously high ; loads of snouts in the trough it seems.
Rebels3
Jim Lenehan (48)
I don’t like making excuses for RA, but you do realize RA makes a loss every WC year
Dan54
Tim Horan (67)
As do NZRU, and I think most RUs. Like you Rebels ,not making excuses, but think it reality with no inbound tours etc.
Strewthcobber
Mark Ella (57)
If RA hadn't taken down all of the old annual reports this year we could have gone back and had a look at how much. AngryEmoji
Pretty much all of the 2003 world cup surplus disappeared on the ARC, and the losses in 2007, 2011 and 2015.
Pretty much all of the 2003 world cup surplus disappeared on the ARC, and the losses in 2007, 2011 and 2015.
In 2015 Rugby Australia (then ARU) had an operating loss of just under $7m. They received almost $19m from World Rugby but that didn't make up for the lost broadcast, matchday and sponsorship revenue from not hosting as many games.
Corporate costs are a long way down from where they were a few years ago. There has been significant improvement there. It was out of control during the John O'Neill years.
Corporate costs are a long way down from where they were a few years ago. There has been significant improvement there. It was out of control during the John O'Neill years.
kiap
Steve Williams (59)
That's not fully accurate. Some non-RWC years hemorrhaged as well to drain the $30+ million. JON himself also took more out of the game for his own remuneration over his time than the ARC did.
My tux didn't come back from the cleaners! An old friend came in from out of town! Someone stole my car! There was an earthquake! A terrible flood! Locusts! IT WASN'T MY FAULT!!!
Just look into these puppy dog eyes … there wasn't enough room on the website and that's honest truth, Guv.
kiap
Steve Williams (59)
The RA website only had the cut-down versions of the reports anyway, for mug punners
Please ensure your full name and return mailing address is provided together with your reasons for requesting each report, and enclose a non-refundable payment of $45 per document to cover the costs of printing to allow the Australian Rugby Union to consider your application.
DISCLAIMER:
"This consise report cannot be expected to provide a full understanding of the financial position, performance or activities of the entity."
… reports for previous financial years may be made available upon receipt of an application in writing.Please ensure your full name and return mailing address is provided together with your reasons for requesting each report, and enclose a non-refundable payment of $45 per document to cover the costs of printing to allow the Australian Rugby Union to consider your application.
Seems like a pretty ridiculous set of goals to set. Sure they should all be goals but if you set your benchmarks that high (relative to prior performance) you'll never get close to achieving them and realistically can't then use them to evaluate performance reasonably.
I like to watch
David Codey (61)
True.
But imagine the reaction if the goals were realistic (and thus disappointing)
Everyone would be looking for their pitchforks
Derpus
George Gregan (70)
Yeah i realised how dumb the thing i said was and deleted it.
I think a realistic set of goals (based on the above) that also wouldn't be aiming too low:
Wallabies: win June series or Bledisloe Cup
Mens Sevens: Win one of three events, make final in another
Womens Sevens: Win two of three events, make semi finals in other
Wallaroos: win a test against NZ
Super Rugby: two teams make finals. One team makes grand final
Now none of those would have been achieved but in my opinion they're far more realistic and can then be better used for performance review and benchmarking.
There's a deferred revenue there of $8M in there as a current liability.
@braveheart, would that be where something like that would sit?