R
Rev Spooner
Guest
They should've stuck with the purple - suited them.
If a jersey is so dam unimportant why didnt they choose a design which didnt match the hosting nation..I would laugh and think it is the ultimate flattery, but I don't think a jersey has magical powers and that colours can be owned, a jersey is a jersey is a jersey.
this whole thing is funny as hell.
the IRB set laws that all teams must have an away jersey to avoid colour clash.
england wear an all white jersey, so to avoid colour clash they should have a dark colour as there alternate. most jersey designs last around 3 years. They usually change for the world cup to sell jerseys and promote innovation from the kit makers.
if england had worn red, it would have been wales colour, if they had worn blue, scotlands and france, green - ireland, why not black? it doesnt matter, there not going to wear it against the all blacks anyway. Wales away jersey is black just with some red trim and no one is complaining about that.
its an absolute beat up of epic proportions.
In fact, they'll probably only wear the jersey against Argentina...
.... and every NZ'er in the crowd will be supporting the Pumas as a result.
If a jersey is so dam unimportant why didn't they choose a design which didnt match the hosting nation..
I think Spiro recently made the preposterous comment that if England came up against the All Blacks and won the coin toss they could go out in their black jerseys like the French did in 2007...
But why would they? Their main strip is white, so there is no clash with the All Blacks...
In fact, they'll probably only wear the jersey against Argentina...
The whole thing is just silly...
dunno, you might as well ask Wales as well
dunno, you might as well ask Wales as well
just the poms tryin to get in the kiwis headspace with mindgames. to me it means they reckon they're gonna be there in the final, and they'll take any edge, advantage and opportunity they can in the mental side of the equation.