Brumby Runner
David Wilson (68)
I asked before in response to a similar comment, but didn't the Senate send a journalist (Newton?) to clink for a while for refusing to disclose a source of a story?
Senate enquiry into Australian Rugby
- Thread starter jimmydubs
- Start date
- Status
I asked before in response to a similar comment, but didn't the Senate send a journalist (Newton?) to clink for a while for refusing to disclose a source of a story?
ForceFan
Chilla Wilson (44)
@ Michael
Unless you're part of the dysfunctional Rugby Australia (formerly ARU) my reference to EARU - Eastern Australia Rugby Union is no slight on you at all.
Clearly by its actions in axing the Western Force the ARU has little interest in developing the game of Rugby Union in Western Australia. Hence I will continue to use the EARU as my reference for this organisation until it changes its mission, values and governance.
Only the IPRC and RugbyWA have shown any interest in maintaining a professional rugby team in WA. I no longer have any interest in activities promoted by the EARU.
That's a difficult situation to get to as I've attended RWC, Spring Tours and Test Rugby in our region. Looking forward now to seeing more of the Indo-Pacific region and getting behind growing this great game in the West.
PS I was originally from Melbourne but moved West >40 years ago.
Unless you're part of the dysfunctional Rugby Australia (formerly ARU) my reference to EARU - Eastern Australia Rugby Union is no slight on you at all.
Clearly by its actions in axing the Western Force the ARU has little interest in developing the game of Rugby Union in Western Australia. Hence I will continue to use the EARU as my reference for this organisation until it changes its mission, values and governance.
Only the IPRC and RugbyWA have shown any interest in maintaining a professional rugby team in WA. I no longer have any interest in activities promoted by the EARU.
That's a difficult situation to get to as I've attended RWC, Spring Tours and Test Rugby in our region. Looking forward now to seeing more of the Indo-Pacific region and getting behind growing this great game in the West.
PS I was originally from Melbourne but moved West >40 years ago.
Brumby Runner
David Wilson (68)
FF (Folau Fainga'a), more to the point and disappointing to me is the attitude of some of the posters on this site is disturbingly similar to that of move along - nothing to see here.
Killer
Cyril Towers (30)
yes agree, short term self interest and therefore no surprise where Aust rugby presently finds itself.
ForceFan
Chilla Wilson (44)
I get the feeling that things may change after Monday. 13 November.......
The Senate Committee is due to issue their report in the afternoon.
Boomer
Alfred Walker (16)
Hi there - not sure at the Federal level. At state level, it's not uncommon. Newton? I don't recognise the name, sorry, but I'm also don't really follow these matters closely.
Brumby Runner
David Wilson (68)
This is the closest I can find on the subject, from Wikipedia.
"Contempt decisions by the House of Representatives or the Senate are thus subject to review by the federal courts. This follows after the Browne–Fitzpatrick privilege case which centred around Morgan, Fitzpatrick and Frank Browne being denied legal representation and subsequently being convicted and serving ninety days each in gaol for publishing an allegedly defamatory article against a member of parliament."
Not quite the same set of circumstances where the contempt was a defamatory article and the chamber concerned was the HofRs.
But jail time was involved, and could result from actions of contempt against the Senate presumably if the Senate thought them serious enough.
"Contempt decisions by the House of Representatives or the Senate are thus subject to review by the federal courts. This follows after the Browne–Fitzpatrick privilege case which centred around Morgan, Fitzpatrick and Frank Browne being denied legal representation and subsequently being convicted and serving ninety days each in gaol for publishing an allegedly defamatory article against a member of parliament."
Not quite the same set of circumstances where the contempt was a defamatory article and the chamber concerned was the HofRs.
But jail time was involved, and could result from actions of contempt against the Senate presumably if the Senate thought them serious enough.
It had nothing to do with "developing the game" it was about cutting the only Super Rugby team they could as cheaply as possible
James Pettifer
Jim Clark (26)
48-72 hours?
wamberal
Phil Kearns (64)
Just in time to be totally swamped by the release of the SSM plebiscite.
This smacks of yet another elitist, private school, conspiracy to me.
Tex
Greg Davis (50)
Theory: the 'Future of Australian rugby' inquiry is a waste of committee time and resources. Here's what they're currently dealing with: Availability and accessibility of diagnostic imaging equipment around Australia. Delivery of outcomes under the National Disability Strategy 2010-2020 to build inclusive and accessible communities. Effectiveness of the Aged Care Quality Assessment and accreditation framework for protecting residents from abuse and poor practices, and ensuring proper clinical and medical care standards are maintained and practised. Future of rugby union in Australia. Number of women in Australia who have had transvaginal mesh implants and related matters. Value and affordability of private health insurance and out-of-pocket medical costs. Tell me which is the odd one out.
brokendown
Vay Wilson (31)
how about waiting for the findings before making that assessment
It will mean nothing, they can be a damning as they want, the decision has been made
brokendown
Vay Wilson (31)
it was not all about the force's removal
It is an horrendous product from J&J that has ruined the lives of many women. There is a class action lawsuit going on at the moment.
- Status