Seriously, you don't think he might have grown as a person in 3 years? I know I did between the ages of 22 and 25.
I understand why people aren't fans of some players for the way they play (although most seem to disregard the fact that players in pro environments are usually playing how coaches want them to play), but it does surprise me how personal the dislike is for some players, Hooper in particular.
For sure he has, and that is easily seen in the brief exposure we can see in interviews, but its relevance is tempered by his ability to overcome the baggage of the past with other players. The comments from others and from himself to referees indicate that perhaps he has not regained the personal capital required to lead, regardless of his growth and maturity now as opposed to then and the wholly relevant fact that he is without doubt the only player performing at the Tahs to a professional standard.
My comment whilst I state I do not really support Hooper as Captain (there is nobody else demanding selection to push him out of it at the Tahs that's for sure) was more about the other players and their lack of maturity and professionalism in being able to be "led", that the entitlement culture is preventing it and those matters mentioned are the reasons why he is largely ineffective as Captain.
In saying that I don't think anybody else would do any better due to those very same reasons, the culture is that broken.