Argentina v Australia II @ 5.10am 14/08
- Thread starter Dctarget
- Start date
- Status
dru
Tim Horan (67)
From my POV the criticism of Wright is about Wright at 15 in that game where the back three/four under the highball were hopeless. He certainly did not provide the organisation that is needed at 15. Nor the back three performance that is needed at 14. Is not that we should right the guy off, we just can't afford for that to happen again. Certainly not against the Springboks.
A lot there MST. Strange that you argue to temper concerns with Wright and follow with thoughts that have me feeling I need to say the same about JOC (James O'Connor). Let me stick to just that quote. Over on ESPN they have adjusted the stats for tackles and it looks more sensible. Still, In that last game JOC (James O'Connor) made 8 tackles, putting him up there with Swain, Tupou, McReight, Valetine on 9 (Lonergan workhorse on 14). Nor do I think White has been a slouch in previous games though with Argentina it was the 10 channel being attacked. Quite the opposite, I couldn't understand why the pack wasn't doing more to protect JOC (James O'Connor). Something that the coaches need to look at in the team structures. Likewise both White and JOC (James O'Connor) were left with little option but to run, because players weren't where they were expecting, not making the gain line, basically because the go-forward was being pushed back.
TLDR: The issue wasn't Wright per se, it was lack of organisation in the back 3 and Wright was not the answer to that issue. JOC (James O'Connor) was fine, exposed in front of a pack that should have been in front of him.
Last edited:
D
DELETE ACCOUNT
Guest
Yep if thats what they want to do, plenty of more talent at 16-18 years old in rugby. Remember the RL is saturated and many of these names might not have even cracked the highest level.
and rugby needs to work on its contracting model so it is attractive instead of trying to go head to head in the same manner with mungoball.
Tomthumb
Colin Windon (37)
There are only 17 NRL teams, I hardly think that can fit all those players in.
If they want to play league, let them go. Develop the ones that want to play rugby. Our best ever 10 came from reserve grade club football. Two decades of chasing schoolboy stars hasn't won us anything
If they want to play league, let them go. Develop the ones that want to play rugby. Our best ever 10 came from reserve grade club football. Two decades of chasing schoolboy stars hasn't won us anything
Tomikin
Simon Poidevin (60)
nope, if there is no oppertunities for a contract to they are 24 - 25, they will end up in France, England, Japan or League. Your kidding yourself if you think this will work.
EDIT:- You didn't say 16 to 18 either you said let them go play senior rugby till their 24 - 25.
Tomikin
Simon Poidevin (60)
You seriously think kids are going to wait till their 24 -25 to earn a wage from sport... you guys are seriously living in the past.
Is that what you did ex all black trialist ?
Tomthumb
Colin Windon (37)
All Black Trialist??
All I know is all these schoolboy stars haven't won anything, the last 20 years have been nothing but signing these guys and losing every year. Something needs to change
D
DELETE ACCOUNT
Guest
I said stop recruiting in the school yard
D
DELETE ACCOUNT
Guest
Agree
Why are we so preoccupied with what mungoball does?
Why cant we build our own program that has clearly defined opportunities that is attractive for those players who are committed to rugby and all the better things the game has?
If you think filling the place with mercenaries is the way to go then I suggest the rusted on hard core engine room of the game will find other ways than support the professional wing of the game. OH WAIT that is what is already happening. Shute Shield and QPR has resurgence of support happening as we speak. Why? because it is a good product that is cost effective for the punter to follow.
Pick us a Wallabies squad entirely of players who didn't have a Super Rugby contract by age 20 then.
I think you're living in the past. There is no option of thinking that our best young talent are going to play several years of amateur club rugby waiting for a professional contract in their early 20s.
while his discipline has been poor I actually think his running game is as good as ever. Because he's doing it in tight. He's incredibly successful at not only getting over the advantage line but at getting quick ball back. I think he's vastly improved in this area.
John S
Chilla Wilson (44)
That's what already happening - Union can't compete with the offers to school kids by Mungoball, and we're losing that talent before they've left school and got into senior rugby (I think I'm agreeing with you here BH)
Tomikin
Simon Poidevin (60)
We aren't but they do go after the same talent we do, you have to live with the reality that we are in a competitive market for talent with AFL and NRL, and if we don't provide a contract to these players they will go else were... No one is going to sit around and wait for Rugby to not pay them..
We currently have a great batch of young men who got contracted young (look at the 10's the forwards we have picked up from the last few under 20's. your idea of just letting them play senior mens would have seen alot of them gone to other places..
This, I love rugby so much that I will play for free or play NRL for 80 k.... ridiculous. And the idea that what we doing isn't working so lets go back the other way and pay them nothing.... Maybe we just have to get better at providing paid pathways and talent identification for young men to stay in our game.
We are also hamstrung by only having 5 professional teams, image if we had the money and cash for 17 teams with the salary cap of the NRL. We would be laughing..
It's the notion that we can somehow build a Wallabies team out of players like Conor Vest, Ryan Smith and Jock Campbell and it will be better than the one we currently have.
D
DELETE ACCOUNT
Guest
even Michael Hooper played amateur colts rugby before he signed a contract.
Why sign them at 17/18 when we can let them develop and show their skills then sign at 20 ? recon we might sort a bit more wheat from the chaff.
Hooper made his Super Rugby debut when he was 18 and had a pro contract the first year out of school. I'm not sure he's a good example to further your argument.
Very few players get substantial contracts at age 17/18. It's probably a couple per team each year. Most of the players that age in the the under 20 squad (Gen Blue for the Waratahs) where they are paid next to nothing (or actually nothing).
Serge
Larry Dwyer (12)
Identify young talent, offer them some form of contract - but they don't go directly to a Super Rugby squad unless they are absolute freaks (and even then go back to Club Rugby if they are not up to it). Instead they have to go and prove themselves in QPR or Shute Shield level Rugby against men for at least one season, demonstrating that they have the skills and the physical attributes to play regularly in first grade against men (and dominate). Then, and only then, do they get a crack in the Super Rugby squad. This also helps grassroots Rugby.
- Status