• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

2025 Bledisloe Cup Series

2025 Bledisloe Cup Series

  • NZ in disarray, the time is now.

    Votes: 18 30.5%
  • Aus to win the Bled

    Votes: 14 23.7%
  • Split series, NZ retain Bled

    Votes: 21 35.6%
  • Aus lose both tests

    Votes: 8 13.6%
  • NZ win both tests

    Votes: 4 6.8%
  • Joe Schmidt to switch booths at halftime

    Votes: 5 8.5%
  • "Dear Wallabies, please take Razor"

    Votes: 5 8.5%
  • the long suffering Wobs deserve this

    Votes: 11 18.6%
  • pole long and hard

    Votes: 8 13.6%
  • pole just long

    Votes: 6 10.2%

  • Total voters
    59

Pfitzy

Phil Waugh (73)
My questions were always going to be about whether McDermott and JOC (James O'Connor) - who have been the finishers of late - could run the ship from the start.

They're not responsible for the ABs having a mountain of possession and territory to start the game, and Tate's injury was unfortunate as he didn't get the chance to prove me wrong. I think he can still be our starting #9 if he's given enough opportunities either in November or during the season at the Reds. Lonergan was good tho.

As for the #10 - some unforgiveable misses there by JOC (James O'Connor) that could have been hero moves e.g. finding touch 5m out instead of handing it back to the ABs. However his experience in running the backline was also key to a lot of our better moments, so I think he gets a farewell gig in Perth before we start putting the right kind of pressure on the remaining 10s on the Euro tour.

We've got time to find the right people, and IMHO it should be a combination like McDermott + Lynagh at the Reds
 

Yoda

John Solomon (38)
It's pathetic.
My comments re 10's is that none of them play a perfect game. JOC (James O'Connor) was hailed as our best and HAD to start. He made some mistakes. They all have. Tests are won on the team that makes the least mistakes and who is penalised less. Our Wallabies are improving under Schmidt definitely. We were in that last Test. We can definitely win in Perth. It's mastering the simple things.
 

Tomthumb

Jim Lenehan (48)
I think Donaldson should be higher up the ranks, can't understand why Edmed is in the 23
Yeah Edmed over Donaldson was a strange one, and pretty disappointed that not a single journo actually asked Schmidt as to why because it would be good to understand
 

Tomthumb

Jim Lenehan (48)
Yes donno is basically the only man left standing. Would be happy for him to get a run. But if he makes one mistake there will be hell to pay!
no one is expecting no mistakes. But I don’t think it’s too much to ask a 70 test veteran to kick a ball over a sideline or kick off inbounds

O’Connor should be held to a higher standard than these young guys
 

rugbyAU

Ken Catchpole (46)
Yeah Edmed over Donaldson was a strange one, and pretty disappointed that not a single journo actually asked Schmidt as to why because it would be good to understand
it's just the inconistency, he was the #2 ten last year
 
Last edited:

Backintheolddays

Bob Loudon (25)
Yeah I don’t think it’s a traditional CEO type role. There aren’t any notable sports administrators in Australia outside PVL who RA should avoid like the black plague even if he were interested, and the admittedly very well credentialed fossils behind the Sydney Olympics. So we probably need to create one, and maybe Phil is the guy. From my understanding he isn’t just a nice bloke, he’s a top bloke who is clearly passionate about rugby, by all accounts he’s honest, and presumably has an understanding of numbers. I’d much rather that than pay some corrupt fuckwit like Alan Joyce a fortune to run the game.
I know Phil socially, good guy, great family man and rugby through and through.
While not solely his call, the hiring of Joe is the best thing for Australian rugby in a decade.
But, he is not a CEO, at least not yet. Strategy and execution is a key requirement and what Australian rugby desperately needs. We’re no longer amateur, we need top tier talent to nail a strategy, ignore the old school tie and embedded state biases, and smash home execution of the strategy over the next five years. No I don’t want a Joyce or Private equity, but we’ve got to move away from ex players running the show, both at board and management level. ( board is much improved from a decade ago).
League was on its knees in the mid 90s yet we his the premium product behind a paywall, gutted the rugby development officer fraternity, and walked away from grass roots footy.
with Joe and the injection of Lions and RWC funding Phil has the perfect opportunity to reestablish our sport to where it belongs. I hope he has the strategic and execution smarts to get us there which remains my concern and the establishment self interest at the state level in our game.
 

rugbyAU

Ken Catchpole (46)
no one is expecting no mistakes. But I don’t think it’s too much to ask a 70 test veteran to kick a ball over a sideline or kick off inbounds

O’Connor should be held to a higher standard than these young guys
Yeah, even Harry Wilson could find touch
 

BDA

Jim Lenehan (48)
There is zero chance Harry Potter was a yellow. It should have been our penalty. Looking forward to explanation from World Rugby.
Agree...the penalty seemed like a 50/50 call in real time. Upon replay i reckon even a penalty would be tough call but at least arguable . Squinting as hard as possibl l cant see how the ref justified a yellow. Even the warning he gave shortly prior that seemed completely unwarranted. We were penalised twice in the last 30 mins effecting a pilfer; both went against us, both could havd, arguably should have, been penalties in our favour., both gave the all blacks cheap points,when they were clearly struggling to get much traction. i can only assume those penalties were part of the refs justfication for a team warning prior to yellow, which makes it even harder to swallow

In that same period NZ were given 2 penaties for steals at the ruck both of which were borderline. It didnt seemed like we were getting the same benefit of the doubt our oppoents were. Sure that's part and parcel of having home ground advantage (you tend to win most of the 50/50 calls) but its still disappointing and from my perspective fairly glaring in this instance. And all those calls are particularly egregious considering the all blacks seemed largely on the backfoot and we appeared to be the team in ascendancy

Ulimately we made too many silly mistakes to allow us to take ref out of the game (thats on us) and they were clinical enough to take advantage of those opportunities.

I would love to think we'll get the same luxuries afforded to us on home ground next week but i wouldnt bet of it
 

Mr Pilfer

Vay Wilson (31)
So I am guessing they won’t have the rugby championship trophy in Perth and a celebration waiting for the winner, as the boks could then win it all a few hours later.

Would therefore be a pretty big anticlimax if argies won and the all blacks or wallabies finished on top but don’t get to celebrate on the field. Can’t remember last time that has happened?
 

Dan54

David Wilson (68)
Not sure having Love covering both FB & 5/8 is the right call, better off imo getting Jacomb over as a specialist bench 10, Edit: there's enough back-three cover & Tupaea can be the 23 as below.

Proctor must be getting close to being dropped but in saying that I'd still have Tupaea on the bench rather than starting so Proctor probably has to get the nod again (bearing in mind the alternatives are AL-B & Rieko) & hopefully he has a better game than last night.

It won't happen but I'd make ASav the captain, have ScoBar on the bench & start Holland with Vaa’i if fit or PatT if not.
I must admit I a bit concerned with Love at only cover at 10 too WOB, but seems he the only one they taken.
On a selfish note, I am reasonably happy, as Jacomb is crucial for the Naki in NPC (and perhaps not a hell of a lot on next week's test), I was actually saying at golf yesterday, I was worried as I thought he would go with ABs, and the Naki may struggle(it will be hard enough against Canterbury).
 

Strewthcobber

Nick Farr-Jones (63)
Agree...the penalty seemed like a 50/50 call in real time. Upon replay i reckon even a penalty would be tough call but at least arguable . Squinting as hard as possibl l cant see how the ref justified a yellow. Even the warning he gave shortly prior that seemed completely unwarranted.
I don't really see the issue with it. Potter enters the contest and immediately isn't supporting his bodyweight (hands in front of the ball).

Then a ruck forms, and his hands are still on the ground. He can't touch the ball at this point.

Then it's just one of the fundamentals of rugby, "no hands in the ruck". He causes the ABs to lose possession, so forces the ref to blow the whistle, and it's 5m out while ABs are red hot on attack - that's a cynical penalty, and a yellow card.
 
Top