GPSrow
Watty Friend (18)
haven't been seein riverview on the lane cove river much. some boys in skulls but more so intermediates. 1 riverview 8 was out today, we will have to wait and see!!!
joeys or kings?
haven't been seein riverview on the lane cove river much. some boys in skulls but more so intermediates. 1 riverview 8 was out today, we will have to wait and see!!!
Hush little one. The Kings 1st Junior shall reign once more.
Newington: Ex-Olympic coach and some HP to boot. Newington appeared to be strong in Grafton, I say appeared because they rested most of the crew for the VIIIs race. Having said that I like their new boat and I like a good ergo - making that ergo float will evidently be their challange. Power and zuities with strings are the key.
Although you may think that new rested there 8's, it is fair to say that they did compete in the sculling, quads and under 17s races all while competing their own race in fine form against the other schools.
So where does this 'resting' come into play??
It was disheartening to know that in the 4's races, on almost 4 occasions, the kings fours consisted of their 1st 8 or 2nd 8's bow/stern four's which made a tough ask for the newington 'fours' to compete with.
Just so you know, I'm not trying to stir up an argument here, this is just what we were told by some members of the crews.[/quote
stirring.
Sorry I'll rephrase that then.
I didn't mean any hostility in my statement and apologise to anyone who may have interpreted it in that way.
Why can't 1st eight members row in the championship 4 division?
Why can't 1st eight members row in the championship 4 division?
Were it a School 1st four race then I would wholeheartedly agree, however one race was the Mens Open Coxed Four, and the other the Championship schoolboy four.
Where do you draw the line? Can an U17 who is also in the 1st eight not compete in the U17 eight as it is technically a lower ranked boat in the Nsw GPS?
I'm sorry but in my opinion once it is an open or championship race it is inviting the best crew you can possibly put into that event.It is similar to the gold cup situation where there is no 1st eight division, only the open eight or whatever it is.
Firstly, all I'm saying is, is that other schools that weren't GPS did put their 1st 8 in the championship four race, but kings to be fair should've known to be fair as they did have the numbers and the oarsmen to put their 1st 4 in the championship race not their 1st 8 stern 4.
Secondly, it is lucky this year, that new has serious talent in the u17 races this year and last year. With a few boys who are in the first 8 being underage but in year 12 meant that undoubtedly there were going to do well.
You have no idea about anything. For starters most of the QLD schools that row are GPS schools. Also at non-GPS regattas the rules do not adhere clubs from boating their top athletes in championship events whether its 8+, 4+, 2- or whatever. Finally explain the logic behind Newington having two scullers in the championship single scull race: if the logic is you only boat top down and one crew for their respective event then you would have only boated one crew to be "fair". That is all.
that sculling race with 2 newington scullers only occurred once, and I'm sure a lot of other schools may have put more boy in the same races, and i believe Newington wanted to take out the big trophy on the day for the most points across the day. Unfortunately, PLC pymble won the trophy and surprise, surprise they had numerous single scullers and other crews doubling up in races. So your argument that you put forward to me had no relevance to what i was talking about. but i have explained for you.
And I'm sorry i meant the Sydney GPS rowing competition and the schools that are involved in that are Newington, Kings, Scots, Shore, Riverview, Grammar and Sydney High. Kings and Newington were up at grafton at the time and noticed that Kings' 1st 8 stern 4 were in the championship four's race. I know for a fact that if they did this, or vice versa newington would try this in a Sydney regatta (non-GPS) where there was a championship fours race, they would put in their 1st 4 not their 1st 8's stern four. it wouldn't look right and would look like they are somewhat 'stacking' their crew.
Last time I looked, Joeys were a GPS school too.. Maybe Newington wouldn't stack their rowing four but what about their prime winter sport?? Oops, did I say that out loud?!! Better grab an umbrella and keep out of the torrent that'll rain down now!
Man print your accusations about other schools not playing "fair", my argument and your counterargument and take it to Dr H, no doubt he'll be able to explain the double standards and general inconsistencies you've presented to us today. Failing that drop by the learning enhancement centre. This forum ought to be about interesting discussion, nobody wants to hear you bag other clubs for cheating when they're not and then go on and on some petty tirade about how the world is colluding against the greater glory of Newington - we get it.
wooh. dude this is getting intense, i didn't know this would be a 'ill tell the teacher on you' incident. This change in font worries me as somehow it is trying to convey how angry you are over something pity and something that maybe would've turned into a interesting discussion point. what happened in the race happened. They got medals and so did 'we'. And for a small forum on G&G there is no huge tirade going with newington. unlike the winter sports situation, well maybe i could concede.
And this Dr.H would be gladly interested to know about the events..ill email him tonight! oh wait..he wouldn't give a s**t. Again this point of discussion was really a small thing that got a 'scots' supporter angry? you go golden bears, you tell em!!!
What's funny is that it's not even the contradictory stuff that you say that's most entertaining, more so the lack of just basic comprehension skills. Tell you what I'll let go of you calling everyone cheaters if you think of a better point of discussion. Shoot man