Tony Shaw (54)
I get it.. but he has earned it.. his always better in tests..Kervis always been worse. Id say Ronas a chance at 13 but Kervis best games been at 12..and if CFS wasnt injuried hed be at 13..
Yes we had some shit performace but they have been much worse when others were at 13..
TK generally steps up in Tests, yes. Kerevi isn’t always worse and I’d argue that he’s rarely worse. He has some flaws but he also has big upsides. Are we always better when TK is at 13? Geez that’s a big call but that’s the problem with absolute statements.
I’m not advocating for anyone at 13 but. I’d be happy with TK or Kerevi to be honest. I think it’s a better look for a team when you reward current form but and make players like TK earn their spot as well. Chieka though, frustratingly has players that he sticks with regardless of current form so who knows what will happen.