terry j
Ron Walden (29)
yes, yes and yes to all of your 'guessing'. Tho funnily enough, I don't recall playing league (or any sport) in the early HS years. That seems a bit odd, maybe I am getting senile. That was when my olds sent me to a private school yada yada.
You, and others, seem to have a grasp of the history of the essential differences between the two games, but my guess is that at the beginning there was not THAT much difference, minor tweaking surely? In any case, that difference was enough for you to say 'no real competition after 07' and it was more attractive.
So what was the chicken and which was the egg? Meaning, if for us (and that may be the problem with how I phrase my question) union is a superior game-including spectacle, ie not just more intellectually engaging-and league in the early days WAS the better game/spectacle, is the current situation due to league rule changes ruining their game, or any union changes improving what was a dour game?
Or both of course.
Still, I spose we have to acknowledge that simply some people prefer checkers over chess.
You, and others, seem to have a grasp of the history of the essential differences between the two games, but my guess is that at the beginning there was not THAT much difference, minor tweaking surely? In any case, that difference was enough for you to say 'no real competition after 07' and it was more attractive.
So what was the chicken and which was the egg? Meaning, if for us (and that may be the problem with how I phrase my question) union is a superior game-including spectacle, ie not just more intellectually engaging-and league in the early days WAS the better game/spectacle, is the current situation due to league rule changes ruining their game, or any union changes improving what was a dour game?
Or both of course.
Still, I spose we have to acknowledge that simply some people prefer checkers over chess.