Winter Tour; Wallabies v France Wednesday 7 July, Brisbane
- Thread starter Tex
- Start date
It was penalty advantage though, and executing it correctly would have resulted in a try. I think that is a reasonable option.
My issue with it was more that the kick could have gone anywhere in behind the French and a try should have resulted. He didn't need to go for the kick pass which is much harder to execute.
The Nomad
Bob Davidson (42)
Biggest concern for me was our inability to build any phase pressure in the first half. The ball either got kicked away early or our attacking rucks were hampered by poor clean out accuracy compounded by slow delivery from Gordon. It equated to very little pressure or questions being asked of the French defence.
The communication/understanding between 9&10 was poor, multiple times plays were slowed down because players were either out of position or didn't know what was next up. Not good enough at Test level.
Big positive is they stayed in the fight and somehow managed a win despite being below par some some fundamental aspects of the game. Now they just need fix those aspects, they hopefully can only get better.
The communication/understanding between 9&10 was poor, multiple times plays were slowed down because players were either out of position or didn't know what was next up. Not good enough at Test level.
Big positive is they stayed in the fight and somehow managed a win despite being below par some some fundamental aspects of the game. Now they just need fix those aspects, they hopefully can only get better.
dru
Tim Horan (67)
Australia ran 366m for France's 210m
Banks 7 runs for 56m
Wright 4 runs for 18m
Paisami 9 runs for 63m
Koroibete 17 runs for 68m
Given that Lolesio was not employed in that area I'm not sure it's the biggest priority - though To'omua did little.
The_Brown_Hornet
John Eales (66)
Was it? I'd have to watch the game again, because I don't recall the advantage call being made. If it was indeed under advantage then go your hardest and I apologise profusely for the criticism. I agree on the kick in behind being the better option if you're going to use the boot. Find some grass and Kellaway probably has the gas and the momentum to pick it up.
Sorry, I got that completely wrong. It wasn't under penalty advantage.
I take back everything I said. It wasn't the right option because it was pretty low percentage.
He had two defenders tracking him with Naisarani just outside him. If he'd drawn those two defenders and popped to Isi, he would have carried to very close to the line at least.
A retreating French defender blocked us going through the hands (Naisarani, Banks and Kellaway).
It's at the 77 minute mark.
The_Brown_Hornet
John Eales (66)
Thought I was going mad there for a moment. In any case, good option taking under pressure is what we should be aiming for and this wasn't an example of it!
The_Brown_Hornet
John Eales (66)
I thought he was out for longer Reg?
dru
Tim Horan (67)
Not convinced on that Derpus - team v team run m suggests that perhaps one team had a problem making distance - not the Wallabies though.
Derpus
George Gregan (70)
Fair enough. Agree to disagree. I think we would be well served with a bigger body hitting the unders line on first phase ball rather than shifting it wide straight away.
We look at lot more composed in attack when we can play off that ball. Wright did it for the Paisami non-try. Hit the line and made ground which forced the French D to have to realign whilst also allowing Gordon to shift the ball to Paisami quickly.
Better than just shifting it wide and relying on Paisami to make shit happen against two defenders.
Zero_Cool
Arch Winning (36)
So observations
Front row:
Slipper was actually pretty quiet outside of the scrum, but he's cooked and will need a rest for game 2.
BPA was exceptional 9/9 tackles, rock solid at scrum time and very good in the lineout bar one overthrow (I felt like maybe tired lifers), and a nice rumble over the line.
AAAAA was 'fine' but Tupou just changed the game, probably the best 3 in the world (maybe he should consider moving back to #1).
Second Row:
Phillip was fine. 3 tackles and 3 misses (50%) is worrying. 2.4m per run from 5 runs and two passes. The lineout functioned fairly well bar one miss.
LSL (Lukhan Salakaia-Loto) was again fine. 4 from 4 tackles, 6 runs and 6 passes so he was active. (I at least felt like LSL (Lukhan Salakaia-Loto) was very impactful in the mauls.)
Back Row:
Valetini was perhas poor to average. 4 and 1 miss tackle; 2 turnovers. 2.5 meters per run off 13 runs & 6 passes, with 2 off-loads. So he was busy but didn't have that BIG impact we hopped to see from him.
Hooper was quite good, obviously scoring a try (50/50 on if it was really a try or not, it's probably a penalty). 6 tackles with 1 miss, 1 penalty. 8 Runs, 5 passes @ around a meter per run.
Wilson was probably the pick of the bunch for the back row. 11 tackles, with 1 miss and a turnover. He had 10 runs for 2.5 meters per run, with 3 passes, 1 defender beaten and an offload.
Halves:
Gordon was poor, perhaps he was average, but we've gotta judge him by Tate and Tte was AWESOME! The numbers don't tell the story here. Tate is just too good.
Lolo was fine but probably not yet the heir apparent we thought he was, perhaps one of the Harrison/Donaldson/Kuenzle will step up, or Lolo can step it up.
Centres:
To'omua was hot garbage, he just looked so slow, his play making was poor, the play just died with him any time he touched the ball. This then forced Hunter Paisami to try to do a lot more. Only 4 tackles and missed 2. 5 runs and 13 passes and 1 offload.
Paisami was good over played his hand largely because he was forced to by Lolo & To'omua not doing too much. He has a major impact with 9 runs making 7 meters per run, 4 defenders beaten and 4 passes. He only made one tackle and gave away 3 turn overs (again likely because he was forced to overplay his hand). But he showed some amazing touches, an incredible kicking game, but again over played his hand on a number of occasions.
Back 3:
Koro was immense, 1 tackle 3 misses isn’t good. But 17 runs over 4 meters per run is very respectable. 4 defenders beaten, and 3 passes. He just injected himself so much and was so dominant going into contact.
Wright was very lack lustre. Only 2 tackles, gave away possession twice. Only 4 runs for 18 meters a few handling errors, butchered a brilliantly created try from Hunter.
Banks was similar to Wright. Perhaps saved by his kicking game, but he had some critical handling errors. More meters than Wright, 56 from 7 runs (8 per run) but is likely boosted by a lot of kick return meters and a clean break.
The Bench:
The reserve front row (Tupou) was immense.
The other reserve forwards, were pretty good.
The reserve backs didn’t have a major impact.
Tate & ‘Nella would have been best on ground had they played 80.
Tupou had 4 runs for 24 meters (6m per run), a pass and offload, 3 defenders beaten, and a clean break. DOMINATED the scrum and just completely changed the game.
Tate had 24 passes, 4 runs for 25m (6m per), a defender beaten and an offload, and perhaps changed the game even more than Tupou when he came on!
Front row:
Slipper was actually pretty quiet outside of the scrum, but he's cooked and will need a rest for game 2.
BPA was exceptional 9/9 tackles, rock solid at scrum time and very good in the lineout bar one overthrow (I felt like maybe tired lifers), and a nice rumble over the line.
AAAAA was 'fine' but Tupou just changed the game, probably the best 3 in the world (maybe he should consider moving back to #1).
Second Row:
Phillip was fine. 3 tackles and 3 misses (50%) is worrying. 2.4m per run from 5 runs and two passes. The lineout functioned fairly well bar one miss.
LSL (Lukhan Salakaia-Loto) was again fine. 4 from 4 tackles, 6 runs and 6 passes so he was active. (I at least felt like LSL (Lukhan Salakaia-Loto) was very impactful in the mauls.)
Back Row:
Valetini was perhas poor to average. 4 and 1 miss tackle; 2 turnovers. 2.5 meters per run off 13 runs & 6 passes, with 2 off-loads. So he was busy but didn't have that BIG impact we hopped to see from him.
Hooper was quite good, obviously scoring a try (50/50 on if it was really a try or not, it's probably a penalty). 6 tackles with 1 miss, 1 penalty. 8 Runs, 5 passes @ around a meter per run.
Wilson was probably the pick of the bunch for the back row. 11 tackles, with 1 miss and a turnover. He had 10 runs for 2.5 meters per run, with 3 passes, 1 defender beaten and an offload.
Halves:
Gordon was poor, perhaps he was average, but we've gotta judge him by Tate and Tte was AWESOME! The numbers don't tell the story here. Tate is just too good.
Lolo was fine but probably not yet the heir apparent we thought he was, perhaps one of the Harrison/Donaldson/Kuenzle will step up, or Lolo can step it up.
Centres:
To'omua was hot garbage, he just looked so slow, his play making was poor, the play just died with him any time he touched the ball. This then forced Hunter Paisami to try to do a lot more. Only 4 tackles and missed 2. 5 runs and 13 passes and 1 offload.
Paisami was good over played his hand largely because he was forced to by Lolo & To'omua not doing too much. He has a major impact with 9 runs making 7 meters per run, 4 defenders beaten and 4 passes. He only made one tackle and gave away 3 turn overs (again likely because he was forced to overplay his hand). But he showed some amazing touches, an incredible kicking game, but again over played his hand on a number of occasions.
Back 3:
Koro was immense, 1 tackle 3 misses isn’t good. But 17 runs over 4 meters per run is very respectable. 4 defenders beaten, and 3 passes. He just injected himself so much and was so dominant going into contact.
Wright was very lack lustre. Only 2 tackles, gave away possession twice. Only 4 runs for 18 meters a few handling errors, butchered a brilliantly created try from Hunter.
Banks was similar to Wright. Perhaps saved by his kicking game, but he had some critical handling errors. More meters than Wright, 56 from 7 runs (8 per run) but is likely boosted by a lot of kick return meters and a clean break.
The Bench:
The reserve front row (Tupou) was immense.
The other reserve forwards, were pretty good.
The reserve backs didn’t have a major impact.
Tate & ‘Nella would have been best on ground had they played 80.
Tupou had 4 runs for 24 meters (6m per run), a pass and offload, 3 defenders beaten, and a clean break. DOMINATED the scrum and just completely changed the game.
Tate had 24 passes, 4 runs for 25m (6m per), a defender beaten and an offload, and perhaps changed the game even more than Tupou when he came on!
TSR
Mark Ella (57)
As far as I can see neither Petaia nor Vunivalu is in the squad. Was there a later announcement of them being called in
https://wallabies.rugby/squad/wallabies
Number 7
Darby Loudon (17)
Both were ruled out because of injury. Rennie has said they will both be available for the Rugby Championships.
https://www.smh.com.au/sport/rugby-...le-petaia-in-major-doubt-20210610-p57zte.html
I didn't mind Valetini's game. He was still going hard in the final minutes, and despite a few mistakes he's definitely worth persisting with. Clearly a tactic to have him roaming in the wider channels so I can't be too annoyed with his slightly lower work rate.
I do like the balance of Valetini/Hooper/Wilson, and think it could take us to the World Cup if we give it time.
I do like the balance of Valetini/Hooper/Wilson, and think it could take us to the World Cup if we give it time.