Karl
Bill McLean (32)
Being somewhat disinterested in the history of sporting codes beyond very basic facts about their evolution, I have recently been given some edumacation by various League fanatics about the horrible way Rugby has treated League and apparently continues to do so, all over the world. I've gotten a little sick of the bleating and whining and accusations of perfidy and corruption and wanted to see if there was a clean and potted way to smack a few balls back over the fence when confronted with rants like the below:
Is there context, defence or counter-attack that can be relatively easily mustered? I can't be bothered frankly becoming a Rugby historian, but I'd like to be able to have a few decent mortars to let fly when under sustained bombardment in the future.
And gidday to the LU lurkers reading this
How about use of grounds and parks being taken away from league, how about the education system being used to protect one code while using it to kill of another code, how about life bans for players choicing to play league and not union, how about one sport being banned in the armed forces, changing locks on public changing rooms and locks on gates to public parks, how about what took place in South Africa in the 60's, France in 40's, New Zeland over the space of 100 years.
Is there context, defence or counter-attack that can be relatively easily mustered? I can't be bothered frankly becoming a Rugby historian, but I'd like to be able to have a few decent mortars to let fly when under sustained bombardment in the future.
And gidday to the LU lurkers reading this