• Welcome to the Green and Gold Rugby forums. As you can see we've upgraded the forums to new software. Your old logon details should work, just click the 'Login' button in the top right.

Reds vs Brumbies, Lang Park, 2nd March 2018 @ 7:00pm AEST

Match result

  • Brumbies win

    Votes: 22 71.0%
  • Reds win

    Votes: 9 29.0%
  • Draw

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    31
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

biggsy

Chilla Wilson (44)
If the high shots that have been called out In this game are dangerous. There should not be scrums in Rugby any more as they play the neck and wrap the arms above there shoulders .
 

dru

Tim Horan (67)
Exactly the lack of consistency is killing fans.. how can the brumbies get away with two head highs, and a dubious cleabout by Arnold at the ruck, yet the Reds get the YC for a tackle which didn’t even make contact with his head.

There’s no bloody consistency in these shit decisions.. the officiating is becoming a joke, I hate to see what happens come test season

No. There is certainly consistency. Swinging arms not so much on the radar. Shoulders are. Players need to take note. Or get penalised.
 

dru

Tim Horan (67)
Gees reds look like they are well coached

Maybe reds fans should give their coach more than than 1 game to solve 5 years of poor reds performance and coaching issues!

Yeah - no not yet to well coached. Yes certainly to giving him time. With caveats.
 

Wilson

David Codey (61)
N o. There is certainly consistency. Swinging arms not so much on the radar. Shoulders are. Players need to take note. Or get penalised.


I disagree, the focus I've seen recently has been around attacking the head and neck - the worst of this has been shoulders, but it's also neck rolls and tip tackles.
 

Ignoto

John Thornett (49)
Hoilesy needs to take a leaf out of Clarkeys book and get some passion in his calling. Just too monotonous.
 

RedsHappy

Tony Shaw (54)
New Super HCs can typically be assessed as to hard improvements in team performance clearly made by Super rounds 5-6.

This was true of White, Link, Cheika in their first years with new assignments in Super Rugby. They all made serious team improvements in most team and key player skills areas by this juncture in their first year.

No meaningful improvements made by that rounds’ point, the call re that new HC is typically a poor one and so it continues in subsequent years.
 

dru

Tim Horan (67)
New Super HCs can typically be assessed as to hard improvements in team performance clearly made by Super rounds 5-6.

This was true of White, Link, Cheika in their first years with new assignments in Super Rugby. They all made serious team improvements in most team and key player skills areas by this juncture in their first year.

No meaningful improvements made by that rounds’ point, the call re that new HC is typically a poor one and so it continues in subsequent years.

Interesting. Not a must. But Brad might make this mark.
 

dru

Tim Horan (67)
Brad's pressure-ball will have some wins. We might need a bit more tonight though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top