Brumby Runner
David Wilson (68)
Didn't see it either but the umpires do have the option to penalise bowlers under the ICC standard test regulations if they think negative legside bowling is going on
25.1 Law 25.1 - Judging a Wide - For bowlers whom umpires consider to be bowling down the leg side as a negative tactic, the strict limited over wide interpretation shall be applied.
OK, so if that's the condition applied to these test matches, there certainly should have been a number of wides called against Wagner. For a couple of periods he was bowling, at least 5 out of 6 deliveries were outside leg stump and he used up his quota of two short balls per batsmen as well. And that was with a 2/7 field split, with a shortish backward square leg (where incidentally both Burns and Smith were finally caught) and a deep, finer leg with the other five fielders all around forward square leg to mid wicket. Not intimidatory bowling, but extremely negative tactics.